Forwarded: [PATCH] ext4: reject inline data flag when i_extra_isize is zero

syzbot posted 1 patch 2 months, 2 weeks ago
fs/ext4/inode.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
fs/ext4/xattr.c |  2 +-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Forwarded: [PATCH] ext4: reject inline data flag when i_extra_isize is zero
Posted by syzbot 2 months, 2 weeks ago
For archival purposes, forwarding an incoming command email to
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com.

***

Subject: [PATCH] ext4: reject inline data flag when i_extra_isize is zero
Author: kartikey406@gmail.com

#syz test: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master


Prevent use-after-free in ext4_search_dir by rejecting inodes that
claim to have inline data but have no extra inode space allocated.
ext4 inline data is stored in the extra inode space beyond the
standard 128-byte inode structure. This requires i_extra_isize to be
non-zero to provide space for the system.data xattr that stores the
inline directory entries or file data.
However, a corrupted filesystem can craft an inode with both:
- i_extra_isize == 0 (no extra space)
- EXT4_INODE_INLINE_DATA flag set (claims to use extra space)
This creates a fundamental inconsistency. When i_extra_isize is zero,
ext4_iget() skips calling ext4_iget_extra_inode(), which means the
inline xattr validation in check_xattrs() never runs. Later, when
ext4_find_inline_entry() attempts to access the inline data, it reads
unvalidated and potentially corrupt xattr structures, leading to
out-of-bounds memory access and use-after-free.
Fix this by validating in ext4_iget() that if an inode has the
EXT4_INODE_INLINE_DATA flag set, i_extra_isize must be non-zero.
This catches the corruption at inode load time before any inline
data operations are attempted.

Reported-by: syzbot+3ee481e21fd75e14c397@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=3ee481e21fd75e14c397
Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
---
 fs/ext4/inode.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
 fs/ext4/xattr.c |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 5b7a15db4953..257e9b1c6416 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -5099,7 +5099,8 @@ static inline int ext4_iget_extra_inode(struct inode *inode,
 	if (EXT4_INODE_HAS_XATTR_SPACE(inode)  &&
 	    *magic == cpu_to_le32(EXT4_XATTR_MAGIC)) {
 		int err;
-
+		ext4_error_inode(inode, "ext4_iget_extra_inode", 5102, 0,
+				 "wow this inode has extra space");
 		err = xattr_check_inode(inode, IHDR(inode, raw_inode),
 					ITAIL(inode, raw_inode));
 		if (err)
@@ -5112,6 +5113,7 @@ static inline int ext4_iget_extra_inode(struct inode *inode,
 		return err;
 	} else
 		EXT4_I(inode)->i_inline_off = 0;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -5414,6 +5416,13 @@ struct inode *__ext4_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino,
 		ei->i_sync_tid = tid;
 		ei->i_datasync_tid = tid;
 	}
+	if (EXT4_INODE_SIZE(inode->i_sb) < EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE) {
+		ext4_error_inode(inode, function, line, 0,
+				 "wow! this inode has less data");
+		if (ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_INLINE_DATA)) {
+			ext4_error_inode(inode, function, line, 0, "wow! this inode is line");
+		}
+	}
 
 	if (EXT4_INODE_SIZE(inode->i_sb) > EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE) {
 		if (ei->i_extra_isize == 0) {
@@ -5422,6 +5431,8 @@ struct inode *__ext4_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino,
 			ei->i_extra_isize = sizeof(struct ext4_inode) -
 					    EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE;
 		} else {
+			ext4_error_inode(inode, function, line, 0,
+					"wow! this inode has reached ext4 iget");
 			ret = ext4_iget_extra_inode(inode, raw_inode, ei);
 			if (ret)
 				goto bad_inode;
diff --git a/fs/ext4/xattr.c b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
index 5a6fe1513fd2..9b4a6978b313 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ check_xattrs(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head *bh,
 	struct ext4_xattr_entry *e = entry;
 	int err = -EFSCORRUPTED;
 	char *err_str;
-
+	ext4_error_inode(inode, "check_xattrs", 198, 0, "wow! we are in check_xattrs");
 	if (bh) {
 		if (BHDR(bh)->h_magic != cpu_to_le32(EXT4_XATTR_MAGIC) ||
 		    BHDR(bh)->h_blocks != cpu_to_le32(1)) {
-- 
2.43.0
Re: Forwarded: [PATCH] ext4: reject inline data flag when i_extra_isize is zero
Posted by kerne test robot 2 months ago

Hello,

kernel test robot noticed "xfstests.generic.482.fail" on:

commit: a0c31dc212c0f22e40ee114504562030264e1246 ("Forwarded: [PATCH] ext4: reject inline data flag when i_extra_isize is zero")
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/syzbot/Forwarded-PATCH-ext4-reject-inline-data-flag-when-i_extra_isize-is-zero/20251003-171522
base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git dev
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/68df92d7.050a0220.2c17c1.0020.GAE@google.com/
patch subject: Forwarded: [PATCH] ext4: reject inline data flag when i_extra_isize is zero

in testcase: xfstests
version: xfstests-x86_64-5a9cd3ef-1_20250910
with following parameters:

	disk: 4HDD
	fs: ext4
	test: generic-482



config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-func
compiler: gcc-14
test machine: 8 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40GHz (Skylake) with 16G memory

(please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)



If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202510142118.8033d04d-lkp@intel.com

2025-10-09 22:02:09 cd /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests
2025-10-09 22:02:10 export TEST_DIR=/fs/sda1
2025-10-09 22:02:10 export TEST_DEV=/dev/sda1
2025-10-09 22:02:10 export FSTYP=ext4
2025-10-09 22:02:10 export SCRATCH_MNT=/fs/scratch
2025-10-09 22:02:10 mkdir /fs/scratch -p
2025-10-09 22:02:10 export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/sda4
2025-10-09 22:02:10 export LOGWRITES_DEV=/dev/sda2
2025-10-09 22:02:10 echo generic/482
2025-10-09 22:02:10 ./check -E tests/exclude/ext4 generic/482
FSTYP         -- ext4
PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 lkp-skl-d07 6.17.0-rc4-00019-ga0c31dc212c0 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Oct 10 05:40:27 CST 2025
MKFS_OPTIONS  -- -F /dev/sda4
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o acl,user_xattr /dev/sda4 /fs/scratch

generic/482       [failed, exit status 1]- output mismatch (see /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//generic/482.out.bad)
    --- tests/generic/482.out	2025-09-10 01:40:16.000000000 +0000
    +++ /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//generic/482.out.bad	2025-10-09 22:03:12.185850079 +0000
    @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
     QA output created by 482
    -Silence is golden
    +_check_generic_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/mapper/thin-vol.482 is inconsistent
    +(see /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//generic/482.full for details)
    ...
    (Run 'diff -u /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/tests/generic/482.out /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//generic/482.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)
Ran: generic/482
Failures: generic/482
Failed 1 of 1 tests




The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251014/202510142118.8033d04d-lkp@intel.com



-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki