drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_dvi.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c | 4 ++-- drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Change camelCase function name sii164ResetChip to sii164_reset_chip
as reported by checkpatch.pl
CHECK: Avoid camelCase: <sii164ResetChip>
Signed-off-by: Richard Akintola <princerichard17a@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_dvi.c | 2 +-
drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c | 4 ++--
drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_dvi.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_dvi.c
index 8b81e8642f9e..cc8ff3978d42 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_dvi.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_dvi.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ static struct dvi_ctrl_device dcft_supported_dvi_controller[] = {
.get_vendor_id = sii164_get_vendor_id,
.get_device_id = sii164GetDeviceID,
#ifdef SII164_FULL_FUNCTIONS
- .reset_chip = sii164ResetChip,
+ .reset_chip = sii164_reset_chip,
.get_chip_string = sii164GetChipString,
.set_power = sii164SetPower,
.enable_hot_plug_detection = sii164EnableHotPlugDetection,
diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
index 2532b60245ac..795f8c86e3c0 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
@@ -250,10 +250,10 @@ long sii164_init_chip(unsigned char edge_select,
#ifdef SII164_FULL_FUNCTIONS
/*
- * sii164ResetChip
+ * sii164_reset_chip
* This function resets the DVI Controller Chip.
*/
-void sii164ResetChip(void)
+void sii164_reset_chip(void)
{
/* Power down */
sii164SetPower(0);
diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.h b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.h
index 71a7c1cb42c4..a9edc9474f87 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.h
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ unsigned short sii164_get_vendor_id(void);
unsigned short sii164GetDeviceID(void);
#ifdef SII164_FULL_FUNCTIONS
-void sii164ResetChip(void);
+void sii164_reset_chip(void);
char *sii164GetChipString(void);
void sii164SetPower(unsigned char powerUp);
void sii164EnableHotPlugDetection(unsigned char enableHotPlug);
--
2.39.5
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 09:53:36AM +0100, Richard Akintola wrote: > Change camelCase function name sii164ResetChip to sii164_reset_chip > as reported by checkpatch.pl > > CHECK: Avoid camelCase: <sii164ResetChip> > > Signed-off-by: Richard Akintola <princerichard17a@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_dvi.c | 2 +- > drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.h | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) You sent 2 different patches with different subject lines, yet they almost did the same thing? Which one should I take or review? Please send a new one, as a version 3, and properly document what changed between this one and the last 2 submissions. thanks, greg k-h
Hi, Yes I did send two different patches (part of the reason I used different subject lines), they did similar things (change camelCase to snake_case, I wanted to get all done in the file, but I learnt it is best done one at a time. So should I have it all done in the file (there are more than 2 camelCase CHECKs), or send it one after the other? (but you could take the first). Thanks Richard Akintola On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 3:18 PM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 09:53:36AM +0100, Richard Akintola wrote: > > Change camelCase function name sii164ResetChip to sii164_reset_chip > > as reported by checkpatch.pl > > > > CHECK: Avoid camelCase: <sii164ResetChip> > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Akintola <princerichard17a@gmail.com> > > --- > > drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_dvi.c | 2 +- > > drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c | 4 ++-- > > drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.h | 2 +- > > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > You sent 2 different patches with different subject lines, yet they > almost did the same thing? Which one should I take or review? Please > send a new one, as a version 3, and properly document what changed > between this one and the last 2 submissions. > > thanks, > > greg k-h
A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting? A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 11:37:48PM +0100, Richard Akintola wrote: > Hi, > > Yes I did send two different patches (part of the reason I used > different subject lines), > they did similar things (change camelCase to snake_case, I wanted to > get all done in the file, > but I learnt it is best done one at a time. > > So should I have it all done in the file (there are more than 2 > camelCase CHECKs), or send it > one after the other? (but you could take the first). Please send it as a patch series. thanks, greg k-h
On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 7:22 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post > Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting? > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > A: No. > Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? > > > http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top Thank you for educating me on top-posting, and I really appreciate that it was given in a top-posting style making me realise the consequences by experience. > Please send it as a patch series. I will send in the patch series as advised. Richard Akintola
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.