[PATCH] drm/radeon: ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"

sunran001@208suo.com posted 1 patch 2 years, 7 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
[PATCH] drm/radeon: ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
Posted by sunran001@208suo.com 2 years, 7 months ago
Fix nine occurrences of the checkpatch.pl error:
ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"

Signed-off-by: Ran Sun <sunran001@208suo.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c | 14 +++++++-------
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
index c1bbfbe28bda..11a1940bb26d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
@@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ static struct {
      atom_op_shr, ATOM_ARG_MC}, {
  atom_op_debug, 0},};

-static int atom_execute_table_locked(struct atom_context *ctx, int 
index, uint32_t * params)
+static int atom_execute_table_locked(struct atom_context *ctx, int 
index, uint32_t *params)
  {
      int base = CU16(ctx->cmd_table + 4 + 2 * index);
      int len, ws, ps, ptr;
@@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@ static int atom_execute_table_locked(struct 
atom_context *ctx, int index, uint32
      return ret;
  }

-int atom_execute_table_scratch_unlocked(struct atom_context *ctx, int 
index, uint32_t * params)
+int atom_execute_table_scratch_unlocked(struct atom_context *ctx, int 
index, uint32_t *params)
  {
      int r;

@@ -1237,7 +1237,7 @@ int atom_execute_table_scratch_unlocked(struct 
atom_context *ctx, int index, uin
      return r;
  }

-int atom_execute_table(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint32_t * 
params)
+int atom_execute_table(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint32_t 
*params)
  {
      int r;
      mutex_lock(&ctx->scratch_mutex);
@@ -1359,8 +1359,8 @@ void atom_destroy(struct atom_context *ctx)
  }

  bool atom_parse_data_header(struct atom_context *ctx, int index,
-                uint16_t * size, uint8_t * frev, uint8_t * crev,
-                uint16_t * data_start)
+                uint16_t *size, uint8_t *frev, uint8_t *crev,
+                uint16_t *data_start)
  {
      int offset = index * 2 + 4;
      int idx = CU16(ctx->data_table + offset);
@@ -1379,8 +1379,8 @@ bool atom_parse_data_header(struct atom_context 
*ctx, int index,
      return true;
  }

-bool atom_parse_cmd_header(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint8_t 
* frev,
-               uint8_t * crev)
+bool atom_parse_cmd_header(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint8_t 
*frev,
+               uint8_t *crev)
  {
      int offset = index * 2 + 4;
      int idx = CU16(ctx->cmd_table + offset);
Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
Posted by Alex Deucher 2 years, 7 months ago
Applied.  Thanks!

On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 3:38 AM <sunran001@208suo.com> wrote:
>
> Fix nine occurrences of the checkpatch.pl error:
> ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
>
> Signed-off-by: Ran Sun <sunran001@208suo.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c | 14 +++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
> index c1bbfbe28bda..11a1940bb26d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
> @@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ static struct {
>       atom_op_shr, ATOM_ARG_MC}, {
>   atom_op_debug, 0},};
>
> -static int atom_execute_table_locked(struct atom_context *ctx, int
> index, uint32_t * params)
> +static int atom_execute_table_locked(struct atom_context *ctx, int
> index, uint32_t *params)
>   {
>       int base = CU16(ctx->cmd_table + 4 + 2 * index);
>       int len, ws, ps, ptr;
> @@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@ static int atom_execute_table_locked(struct
> atom_context *ctx, int index, uint32
>       return ret;
>   }
>
> -int atom_execute_table_scratch_unlocked(struct atom_context *ctx, int
> index, uint32_t * params)
> +int atom_execute_table_scratch_unlocked(struct atom_context *ctx, int
> index, uint32_t *params)
>   {
>       int r;
>
> @@ -1237,7 +1237,7 @@ int atom_execute_table_scratch_unlocked(struct
> atom_context *ctx, int index, uin
>       return r;
>   }
>
> -int atom_execute_table(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint32_t *
> params)
> +int atom_execute_table(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint32_t
> *params)
>   {
>       int r;
>       mutex_lock(&ctx->scratch_mutex);
> @@ -1359,8 +1359,8 @@ void atom_destroy(struct atom_context *ctx)
>   }
>
>   bool atom_parse_data_header(struct atom_context *ctx, int index,
> -                uint16_t * size, uint8_t * frev, uint8_t * crev,
> -                uint16_t * data_start)
> +                uint16_t *size, uint8_t *frev, uint8_t *crev,
> +                uint16_t *data_start)
>   {
>       int offset = index * 2 + 4;
>       int idx = CU16(ctx->data_table + offset);
> @@ -1379,8 +1379,8 @@ bool atom_parse_data_header(struct atom_context
> *ctx, int index,
>       return true;
>   }
>
> -bool atom_parse_cmd_header(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint8_t
> * frev,
> -               uint8_t * crev)
> +bool atom_parse_cmd_header(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint8_t
> *frev,
> +               uint8_t *crev)
>   {
>       int offset = index * 2 + 4;
>       int idx = CU16(ctx->cmd_table + offset);