We should have 'n', then 'size', not the opposite.
This is harmless because the 2 values are just multiplied, but having
the correct order silence a (unpublished yet) smatch warning.

While at it use '*tun_seg' instead '*seg'. The both variable have the same
type, so the result is the same, but it lokks more logical.

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool_fdir.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool_fdir.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool_fdir.c
index 5d10c4f84a36..ead6d50fc0ad 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool_fdir.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool_fdir.c
@@ -852,7 +852,7 @@ ice_create_init_fdir_rule(struct ice_pf *pf, enum ice_fltr_ptype flow)
 	if (!seg)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	tun_seg = devm_kcalloc(dev, sizeof(*seg), ICE_FD_HW_SEG_MAX,
+	tun_seg = devm_kcalloc(dev, ICE_FD_HW_SEG_MAX, sizeof(*tun_seg),
 			       GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!tun_seg) {
 		devm_kfree(dev, seg);
@@ -1214,7 +1214,7 @@ ice_cfg_fdir_xtrct_seq(struct ice_pf *pf, struct ethtool_rx_flow_spec *fsp,
 	if (!seg)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	tun_seg = devm_kcalloc(dev, sizeof(*seg), ICE_FD_HW_SEG_MAX,
+	tun_seg = devm_kcalloc(dev, ICE_FD_HW_SEG_MAX, sizeof(*tun_seg),
 			       GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!tun_seg) {
 		devm_kfree(dev, seg);
-- 
2.34.1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org> On Behalf Of
> Christophe JAILLET
> Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2022 12:27 PM
> To: Brandeburg, Jesse <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>; Nguyen, Anthony L
> <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>;
> Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>;
> Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> Cc: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>; intel-wired-
> lan@lists.osuosl.org; kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] ice: Use correct order for the parameters
> of devm_kcalloc()
> 
> We should have 'n', then 'size', not the opposite.
> This is harmless because the 2 values are just multiplied, but having the
> correct order silence a (unpublished yet) smatch warning.
> 
> While at it use '*tun_seg' instead '*seg'. The both variable have the same
> type, so the result is the same, but it lokks more logical.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool_fdir.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

Tested-by: Gurucharan <gurucharanx.g@intel.com> (A Contingent worker at Intel)