bpf/tests: Add 32 bits only mong conditional jump tests

[PATCH bpf-next] bpf/tests: Add 32 bits only mong conditional jump tests

Posted by Christophe Leroy 1 year, 1 month ago

Commit f1517eb790f9 ("bpf/tests: Expand branch conversion JIT test")
introduced "Long conditional jump tests" but due to those tests making
use of 64 bits DIV and MOD, they don't get jited on powerpc/32,
leading to the Long conditional jump test being skiped for unrelated
reason.

Add 4 new tests that are restricted to 32 bits ALU so that the jump
tests can also be performed on platforms that do no support 64 bits
operations.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
 lib/test_bpf.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index 2eed1ad958e9..af0041df2b72 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ static int __bpf_ld_imm64(struct bpf_insn insns[2], u8 reg, s64 imm64)
  * to overflow the field size of the native instruction, triggering
  * a branch conversion mechanism in some JITs.
  */
-static int __bpf_fill_max_jmp(struct bpf_test *self, int jmp, int imm)
+static int __bpf_fill_max_jmp(struct bpf_test *self, int jmp, int imm, bool alu32)
 {
 	struct bpf_insn *insns;
 	int len = S16_MAX + 5;
@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ static int __bpf_fill_max_jmp(struct bpf_test *self, int jmp, int imm)
 		};
 		int op = ops[(i >> 1) % ARRAY_SIZE(ops)];
 
-		if (i & 1)
+		if ((i & 1) || alu32)
 			insns[i++] = BPF_ALU32_REG(op, R0, R1);
 		else
 			insns[i++] = BPF_ALU64_REG(op, R0, R1);
@@ -516,27 +516,47 @@ static int __bpf_fill_max_jmp(struct bpf_test *self, int jmp, int imm)
 }
 
 /* Branch taken by runtime decision */
+static int bpf_fill_max_jmp_taken_32(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+	return __bpf_fill_max_jmp(self, BPF_JEQ, 1, true);
+}
+
 static int bpf_fill_max_jmp_taken(struct bpf_test *self)
 {
-	return __bpf_fill_max_jmp(self, BPF_JEQ, 1);
+	return __bpf_fill_max_jmp(self, BPF_JEQ, 1, false);
 }
 
 /* Branch not taken by runtime decision */
+static int bpf_fill_max_jmp_not_taken_32(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+	return __bpf_fill_max_jmp(self, BPF_JEQ, 0, true);
+}
+
 static int bpf_fill_max_jmp_not_taken(struct bpf_test *self)
 {
-	return __bpf_fill_max_jmp(self, BPF_JEQ, 0);
+	return __bpf_fill_max_jmp(self, BPF_JEQ, 0, false);
 }
 
 /* Branch always taken, known at JIT time */
+static int bpf_fill_max_jmp_always_taken_32(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+	return __bpf_fill_max_jmp(self, BPF_JGE, 0, true);
+}
+
 static int bpf_fill_max_jmp_always_taken(struct bpf_test *self)
 {
-	return __bpf_fill_max_jmp(self, BPF_JGE, 0);
+	return __bpf_fill_max_jmp(self, BPF_JGE, 0, false);
 }
 
 /* Branch never taken, known at JIT time */
+static int bpf_fill_max_jmp_never_taken_32(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+	return __bpf_fill_max_jmp(self, BPF_JLT, 0, true);
+}
+
 static int bpf_fill_max_jmp_never_taken(struct bpf_test *self)
 {
-	return __bpf_fill_max_jmp(self, BPF_JLT, 0);
+	return __bpf_fill_max_jmp(self, BPF_JLT, 0, false);
 }
 
 /* ALU result computation used in tests */
@@ -14233,6 +14253,38 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 		{ { 0, 0 } },
 	},
 	/* Conditional branch conversions */
+	{
+		"Long conditional jump: taken at runtime (32 bits)",
+		{ },
+		INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+		{ },
+		{ { 0, 1 } },
+		.fill_helper = bpf_fill_max_jmp_taken_32,
+	},
+	{
+		"Long conditional jump: not taken at runtime (32 bits)",
+		{ },
+		INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+		{ },
+		{ { 0, 2 } },
+		.fill_helper = bpf_fill_max_jmp_not_taken_32,
+	},
+	{
+		"Long conditional jump: always taken, known at JIT time (32 bits)",
+		{ },
+		INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+		{ },
+		{ { 0, 1 } },
+		.fill_helper = bpf_fill_max_jmp_always_taken_32,
+	},
+	{
+		"Long conditional jump: never taken, known at JIT time (32 bits)",
+		{ },
+		INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+		{ },
+		{ { 0, 2 } },
+		.fill_helper = bpf_fill_max_jmp_never_taken_32,
+	},
 	{
 		"Long conditional jump: taken at runtime",
 		{ },
-- 
2.47.0

Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf/tests: Add 32 bits only mong conditional jump tests

Posted by Daniel Borkmann 1 year, 1 month ago

On 1/6/25 10:15 AM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Commit f1517eb790f9 ("bpf/tests: Expand branch conversion JIT test")
> introduced "Long conditional jump tests" but due to those tests making
> use of 64 bits DIV and MOD, they don't get jited on powerpc/32,
> leading to the Long conditional jump test being skiped for unrelated
> reason.
> 
> Add 4 new tests that are restricted to 32 bits ALU so that the jump
> tests can also be performed on platforms that do no support 64 bits
> operations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>

lgtm, fixed $subj s/mong/long/ while applying, thanks!