'struct fsl_spdif_soc_data' and 'struct snd_kcontrol_new' are not modified
in this driver.

Constifying these structures moves some data to a read-only section, so
increases overall security, especially when the structure holds some
function pointers.

On a x86_64, with allmodconfig:
Before:
======
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
  53548	  25576	    128	  79252	  13594	sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.o

After:
=====
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
  54828	  24296	    128	  79252	  13594	sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.o

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
---
 sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c
index ee946e0d3f49..1b9be85b34c2 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ struct fsl_spdif_priv {
 	struct clk *pll11k_clk;
 };
 
-static struct fsl_spdif_soc_data fsl_spdif_vf610 = {
+static const struct fsl_spdif_soc_data fsl_spdif_vf610 = {
 	.imx = false,
 	.shared_root_clock = false,
 	.raw_capture_mode = false,
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static struct fsl_spdif_soc_data fsl_spdif_vf610 = {
 	.tx_formats = FSL_SPDIF_FORMATS_PLAYBACK,
 };
 
-static struct fsl_spdif_soc_data fsl_spdif_imx35 = {
+static const struct fsl_spdif_soc_data fsl_spdif_imx35 = {
 	.imx = true,
 	.shared_root_clock = false,
 	.raw_capture_mode = false,
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static struct fsl_spdif_soc_data fsl_spdif_imx35 = {
 	.tx_formats = FSL_SPDIF_FORMATS_PLAYBACK,
 };
 
-static struct fsl_spdif_soc_data fsl_spdif_imx6sx = {
+static const struct fsl_spdif_soc_data fsl_spdif_imx6sx = {
 	.imx = true,
 	.shared_root_clock = true,
 	.raw_capture_mode = false,
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static struct fsl_spdif_soc_data fsl_spdif_imx6sx = {
 
 };
 
-static struct fsl_spdif_soc_data fsl_spdif_imx8qm = {
+static const struct fsl_spdif_soc_data fsl_spdif_imx8qm = {
 	.imx = true,
 	.shared_root_clock = true,
 	.raw_capture_mode = false,
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static struct fsl_spdif_soc_data fsl_spdif_imx8qm = {
 	.tx_formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_LE,  /* Applied for EDMA */
 };
 
-static struct fsl_spdif_soc_data fsl_spdif_imx8mm = {
+static const struct fsl_spdif_soc_data fsl_spdif_imx8mm = {
 	.imx = true,
 	.shared_root_clock = false,
 	.raw_capture_mode = true,
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static struct fsl_spdif_soc_data fsl_spdif_imx8mm = {
 	.tx_formats = FSL_SPDIF_FORMATS_PLAYBACK,
 };
 
-static struct fsl_spdif_soc_data fsl_spdif_imx8ulp = {
+static const struct fsl_spdif_soc_data fsl_spdif_imx8ulp = {
 	.imx = true,
 	.shared_root_clock = true,
 	.raw_capture_mode = false,
@@ -1146,7 +1146,7 @@ static int fsl_spdif_usync_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 }
 
 /* FSL SPDIF IEC958 controller defines */
-static struct snd_kcontrol_new fsl_spdif_ctrls[] = {
+static const struct snd_kcontrol_new fsl_spdif_ctrls[] = {
 	/* Status cchanel controller */
 	{
 		.iface = SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_IFACE_MIXER,
@@ -1233,7 +1233,7 @@ static struct snd_kcontrol_new fsl_spdif_ctrls[] = {
 	},
 };
 
-static struct snd_kcontrol_new fsl_spdif_ctrls_rcm[] = {
+static const struct snd_kcontrol_new fsl_spdif_ctrls_rcm[] = {
 	{
 		.iface = SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_IFACE_PCM,
 		.name = "IEC958 Raw Capture Mode",
-- 
2.51.1

On Mon, 03 Nov 2025 07:32:03 +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> 'struct fsl_spdif_soc_data' and 'struct snd_kcontrol_new' are not modified
> in this driver.
> 
> Constifying these structures moves some data to a read-only section, so
> increases overall security, especially when the structure holds some
> function pointers.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: fsl_spdif: Constify some structures
      commit: 1a88479436a52452429f6d50ec5bd0a546406485

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark