[PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI: TAD: Use PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE()/PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR()

Rafael J. Wysocki posted 3 patches 1 month ago
[PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI: TAD: Use PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE()/PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR()
Posted by Rafael J. Wysocki 1 month ago
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Use new PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE() and PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR() wrapper macros
to make the code look more straightforward.

No intentional funtional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---

v1 -> v2: Adjust to the changes in patch [1/3].

---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_tad.c |   24 ++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_tad.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_tad.c
@@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ static int acpi_tad_set_real_time(struct
 	args[0].buffer.pointer = (u8 *)rt;
 	args[0].buffer.length = sizeof(*rt);
 
-	ACQUIRE(pm_runtime_active_try, pm)(dev);
-	if (ACQUIRE_ERR(pm_runtime_active_try, &pm))
+	PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE(dev, pm);
+	if (PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR(&pm))
 		return -ENXIO;
 
 	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_SRT", &arg_list, &retval);
@@ -137,8 +137,8 @@ static int acpi_tad_get_real_time(struct
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	ACQUIRE(pm_runtime_active_try, pm)(dev);
-	if (ACQUIRE_ERR(pm_runtime_active_try, &pm))
+	PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE(dev, pm);
+	if (PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR(&pm))
 		return -ENXIO;
 
 	ret = acpi_tad_evaluate_grt(dev, rt);
@@ -275,8 +275,8 @@ static int acpi_tad_wake_set(struct devi
 	args[0].integer.value = timer_id;
 	args[1].integer.value = value;
 
-	ACQUIRE(pm_runtime_active_try, pm)(dev);
-	if (ACQUIRE_ERR(pm_runtime_active_try, &pm))
+	PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE(dev, pm);
+	if (PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR(&pm))
 		return -ENXIO;
 
 	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, method, &arg_list, &retval);
@@ -322,8 +322,8 @@ static ssize_t acpi_tad_wake_read(struct
 
 	args[0].integer.value = timer_id;
 
-	ACQUIRE(pm_runtime_active_try, pm)(dev);
-	if (ACQUIRE_ERR(pm_runtime_active_try, &pm))
+	PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE(dev, pm);
+	if (PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR(&pm))
 		return -ENXIO;
 
 	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, method, &arg_list, &retval);
@@ -377,8 +377,8 @@ static int acpi_tad_clear_status(struct
 
 	args[0].integer.value = timer_id;
 
-	ACQUIRE(pm_runtime_active_try, pm)(dev);
-	if (ACQUIRE_ERR(pm_runtime_active_try, &pm))
+	PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE(dev, pm);
+	if (PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR(&pm))
 		return -ENXIO;
 
 	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_CWS", &arg_list, &retval);
@@ -417,8 +417,8 @@ static ssize_t acpi_tad_status_read(stru
 
 	args[0].integer.value = timer_id;
 
-	ACQUIRE(pm_runtime_active_try, pm)(dev);
-	if (ACQUIRE_ERR(pm_runtime_active_try, &pm))
+	PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE(dev, pm);
+	if (PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR(&pm))
 		return -ENXIO;
 
 	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_GWS", &arg_list, &retval);
Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI: TAD: Use PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE()/PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR()
Posted by Dhruva Gole 1 month ago
On Nov 13, 2025 at 20:34:53 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> Use new PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE() and PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR() wrapper macros
> to make the code look more straightforward.
> 
> No intentional funtional impact.

Nit: 'functional'

Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> v1 -> v2: Adjust to the changes in patch [1/3].
> 
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_tad.c |   24 ++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_tad.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_tad.c
> @@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ static int acpi_tad_set_real_time(struct
>  	args[0].buffer.pointer = (u8 *)rt;
>  	args[0].buffer.length = sizeof(*rt);
>  
> -	ACQUIRE(pm_runtime_active_try, pm)(dev);
> -	if (ACQUIRE_ERR(pm_runtime_active_try, &pm))
> +	PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE(dev, pm);
> +	if (PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR(&pm))
>  		return -ENXIO;
>  
>  	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_SRT", &arg_list, &retval);
> @@ -137,8 +137,8 @@ static int acpi_tad_get_real_time(struct
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ACQUIRE(pm_runtime_active_try, pm)(dev);
> -	if (ACQUIRE_ERR(pm_runtime_active_try, &pm))
> +	PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE(dev, pm);
> +	if (PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR(&pm))
>  		return -ENXIO;
>  
>  	ret = acpi_tad_evaluate_grt(dev, rt);
> @@ -275,8 +275,8 @@ static int acpi_tad_wake_set(struct devi
>  	args[0].integer.value = timer_id;
>  	args[1].integer.value = value;
>  
> -	ACQUIRE(pm_runtime_active_try, pm)(dev);
> -	if (ACQUIRE_ERR(pm_runtime_active_try, &pm))
> +	PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE(dev, pm);
> +	if (PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR(&pm))
>  		return -ENXIO;
>  
>  	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, method, &arg_list, &retval);
> @@ -322,8 +322,8 @@ static ssize_t acpi_tad_wake_read(struct
>  
>  	args[0].integer.value = timer_id;
>  
> -	ACQUIRE(pm_runtime_active_try, pm)(dev);
> -	if (ACQUIRE_ERR(pm_runtime_active_try, &pm))
> +	PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE(dev, pm);
> +	if (PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR(&pm))
>  		return -ENXIO;
>  
>  	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, method, &arg_list, &retval);
> @@ -377,8 +377,8 @@ static int acpi_tad_clear_status(struct
>  
>  	args[0].integer.value = timer_id;
>  
> -	ACQUIRE(pm_runtime_active_try, pm)(dev);
> -	if (ACQUIRE_ERR(pm_runtime_active_try, &pm))
> +	PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE(dev, pm);
> +	if (PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR(&pm))
>  		return -ENXIO;
>  
>  	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_CWS", &arg_list, &retval);
> @@ -417,8 +417,8 @@ static ssize_t acpi_tad_status_read(stru
>  
>  	args[0].integer.value = timer_id;
>  
> -	ACQUIRE(pm_runtime_active_try, pm)(dev);
> -	if (ACQUIRE_ERR(pm_runtime_active_try, &pm))
> +	PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE(dev, pm);
> +	if (PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR(&pm))
>  		return -ENXIO;
>  
>  	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_GWS", &arg_list, &retval);
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Best regards,
Dhruva Gole
Texas Instruments Incorporated