From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Data-only subnode links following the ACPI data subnode GUID in a _DSD
package are expected to point to named objects returning _DSD-equivalent
packages. If a reference to such an object is used in the target field
of any of those links, that object will be evaluated in place (as a
named object) and its return data will be embedded in the outer _DSD
package.
For this reason, it is not expected to see a subnode link with the
target field containing a local reference (that would mean pointing
to a device or another object that cannot be evaluated in place and
therefore cannot return a _DSD-equivalent package).
Accordingly, simplify the code parsing data-only subnode links to
simply print a message when it encounters a local reference in the
target field of one of those links.
Moreover, since acpi_nondev_subnode_data_ok() would only have one
caller after the change above, fold it into that caller.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/CAJZ5v0jVeSrDO6hrZhKgRZrH=FpGD4vNUjFD8hV9WwN9TLHjzQ@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
v1 -> v2: New patch
---
drivers/acpi/property.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/acpi/property.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c
@@ -124,32 +124,12 @@ static bool acpi_nondev_subnode_extract(
return false;
}
-static bool acpi_nondev_subnode_data_ok(acpi_handle handle,
- const union acpi_object *link,
- struct list_head *list,
- struct fwnode_handle *parent)
-{
- struct acpi_buffer buf = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER };
- acpi_status status;
-
- status = acpi_evaluate_object_typed(handle, NULL, NULL, &buf,
- ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
- return false;
-
- if (acpi_nondev_subnode_extract(buf.pointer, handle, link, list,
- parent))
- return true;
-
- ACPI_FREE(buf.pointer);
- return false;
-}
-
static bool acpi_nondev_subnode_ok(acpi_handle scope,
const union acpi_object *link,
struct list_head *list,
struct fwnode_handle *parent)
{
+ struct acpi_buffer buf = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER };
acpi_handle handle;
acpi_status status;
@@ -161,7 +141,17 @@ static bool acpi_nondev_subnode_ok(acpi_
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
return false;
- return acpi_nondev_subnode_data_ok(handle, link, list, parent);
+ status = acpi_evaluate_object_typed(handle, NULL, NULL, &buf,
+ ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+ return false;
+
+ if (acpi_nondev_subnode_extract(buf.pointer, handle, link, list,
+ parent))
+ return true;
+
+ ACPI_FREE(buf.pointer);
+ return false;
}
static bool acpi_add_nondev_subnodes(acpi_handle scope,
@@ -174,7 +164,6 @@ static bool acpi_add_nondev_subnodes(acp
for (i = 0; i < links->package.count; i++) {
union acpi_object *link, *desc;
- acpi_handle handle;
bool result;
link = &links->package.elements[i];
@@ -186,22 +175,26 @@ static bool acpi_add_nondev_subnodes(acp
if (link->package.elements[0].type != ACPI_TYPE_STRING)
continue;
- /* The second one may be a string, a reference or a package. */
+ /* The second one may be a string or a package. */
switch (link->package.elements[1].type) {
case ACPI_TYPE_STRING:
result = acpi_nondev_subnode_ok(scope, link, list,
parent);
break;
- case ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE:
- handle = link->package.elements[1].reference.handle;
- result = acpi_nondev_subnode_data_ok(handle, link, list,
- parent);
- break;
case ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE:
desc = &link->package.elements[1];
result = acpi_nondev_subnode_extract(desc, NULL, link,
list, parent);
break;
+ case ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE:
+ /*
+ * It is not expected to see any local references in
+ * the links package because referencing a named object
+ * should cause it to be evaluated in place.
+ */
+ acpi_handle_info(scope, "subnode %s: Unexpected reference\n",
+ link->package.elements[0].string.pointer);
+ fallthrough;
default:
result = false;
break;