fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:54:59 +0200
Replace two dput(child) calls with one that occurs immediately before
the IS_ERR evaluation. This transformation can be performed because
dput() gets called regardless of the value returned by IS_ERR(res).
This issue was transformed by using a script for the
semantic patch language like the following.
<SmPL>
@extended_adjustment@
expression e, f != { mutex_unlock }, x, y;
@@
+f(e);
if (...)
{
<+... when != \( e = x \| y(..., &e, ...) \)
- f(e);
...+>
}
-f(e);
</SmPL>
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
V2:
* This update suggestion was rebased on source files of the software
“Linux next-20241023”.
* The change description was adjusted according to the wording preferences
by Joel Granados.
* An SmPL script example was appended.
fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
index 9b9dfc450cb3..b277a1ca392e 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
@@ -698,11 +698,11 @@ static bool proc_sys_fill_cache(struct file *file,
res = d_splice_alias(inode, child);
d_lookup_done(child);
if (unlikely(res)) {
- if (IS_ERR(res)) {
- dput(child);
- return false;
- }
dput(child);
+
+ if (IS_ERR(res))
+ return false;
+
child = res;
}
}
--
2.47.0
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 05:27:11PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:54:59 +0200
Small comment: Remember to send out a new patch-set email in order to
make it easier for tools like b4.
>
> Replace two dput(child) calls with one that occurs immediately before
> the IS_ERR evaluation. This transformation can be performed because
> dput() gets called regardless of the value returned by IS_ERR(res).
>
> This issue was transformed by using a script for the
> semantic patch language like the following.
> <SmPL>
> @extended_adjustment@
> expression e, f != { mutex_unlock }, x, y;
> @@
> +f(e);
> if (...)
> {
> <+... when != \( e = x \| y(..., &e, ...) \)
> - f(e);
> ...+>
> }
> -f(e);
> </SmPL>
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>
> V2:
> * This update suggestion was rebased on source files of the software
> “Linux next-20241023”.
>
> * The change description was adjusted according to the wording preferences
> by Joel Granados.
>
> * An SmPL script example was appended.
>
>
> fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
> index 9b9dfc450cb3..b277a1ca392e 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
> @@ -698,11 +698,11 @@ static bool proc_sys_fill_cache(struct file *file,
> res = d_splice_alias(inode, child);
> d_lookup_done(child);
> if (unlikely(res)) {
> - if (IS_ERR(res)) {
> - dput(child);
> - return false;
> - }
> dput(child);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(res))
> + return false;
> +
> child = res;
> }
> }
> --
> 2.47.0
>
This looks good to me. I'll push it to sysctl-next.
Thx for the patch
Reviewed-by: Joel Granados <joel.granados@kernel.org>
Best
--
Joel Granados
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 05:27:11PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:54:59 +0200
>
> Replace two dput(child) calls with one that occurs immediately before
> the IS_ERR evaluation. This transformation can be performed because
> dput() gets called regardless of the value returned by IS_ERR(res).
>
> This issue was transformed by using a script for the
> semantic patch language like the following.
> <SmPL>
Aren't you missing a "virtual patch" here?
Is there another way to run it besides this command:
make coccicheck MODE=patch SPFLAGS="--in-place --include-headers --smpl-spacing --jobs=16" COCCI=SCRIPT
Best
> @extended_adjustment@
> expression e, f != { mutex_unlock }, x, y;
> @@
> +f(e);
> if (...)
> {
> <+... when != \( e = x \| y(..., &e, ...) \)
> - f(e);
> ...+>
> }
> -f(e);
> </SmPL>
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>
> V2:
> * This update suggestion was rebased on source files of the software
> “Linux next-20241023”.
>
> * The change description was adjusted according to the wording preferences
> by Joel Granados.
>
> * An SmPL script example was appended.
>
>
> fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
> index 9b9dfc450cb3..b277a1ca392e 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
> @@ -698,11 +698,11 @@ static bool proc_sys_fill_cache(struct file *file,
> res = d_splice_alias(inode, child);
> d_lookup_done(child);
> if (unlikely(res)) {
> - if (IS_ERR(res)) {
> - dput(child);
> - return false;
> - }
> dput(child);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(res))
> + return false;
> +
> child = res;
> }
> }
> --
> 2.47.0
>
--
Joel Granados
… >> This issue was transformed by using a script for the >> semantic patch language like the following. >> <SmPL> > Aren't you missing a "virtual patch" here? Yes. I presented an SmPL script example which would not be directly used for the tool “coccicheck”. > Is there another way to run it besides this command: Another command example: time spatch -timeout 23 -j4 --chunksize 1 --no-loops -dir . …/Projekte/Coccinelle/janitor/avoid_duplicate_function_call2.cocci > …/Projekte/Bau/Linux/scripts/Coccinelle/tuning1/next/20240913/avoid_duplicate_function_call2-no_loops.diff 2> …/Projekte/Bau/Linux/scripts/Coccinelle/tuning1/next/20240913/avoid_duplicate_function_call2-no_loops-errors.txt Regards, Markus
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.