drivers/regulator/da9211-regulator.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
'struct regulator_desc' is not modified in this driver.
Constifying this structure moves some data to a read-only section, so
increase overall security, especially when the structure holds some
function pointers.
On a x86_64, with allmodconfig:
Before:
======
text data bss dec hex filename
13982 2118 16 16116 3ef4 drivers/regulator/da9211-regulator.o
After:
=====
text data bss dec hex filename
14622 1478 16 16116 3ef4 drivers/regulator/da9211-regulator.o
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
--
Compile tested only
---
drivers/regulator/da9211-regulator.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9211-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/da9211-regulator.c
index d8b39ea3de0e..d4f14d7ea8cf 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/da9211-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/da9211-regulator.c
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static const struct regulator_ops da9211_buck_ops = {
.of_map_mode = da9211_map_buck_mode,\
}
-static struct regulator_desc da9211_regulators[] = {
+static const struct regulator_desc da9211_regulators[] = {
DA9211_BUCK(BUCKA),
DA9211_BUCK(BUCKB),
};
--
2.46.0
On Sun, 08 Sep 2024 10:41:11 +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> 'struct regulator_desc' is not modified in this driver.
>
> Constifying this structure moves some data to a read-only section, so
> increase overall security, especially when the structure holds some
> function pointers.
>
> On a x86_64, with allmodconfig:
> Before:
> ======
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 13982 2118 16 16116 3ef4 drivers/regulator/da9211-regulator.o
>
> [...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] regulator: da9211: Constify struct regulator_desc
commit: 0c0966b5019f97e2af0ab802c1453162748b1166
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.