There is a spelling mistake of 'ACCCESS_LOCAL' which should be
'ACCESS_LOCAL'.

Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: WangYuli <wangyuli@uniontech.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
index c04bb7f97a4d..7680474c4f96 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static int intel_pmt_populate_entry(struct intel_pmt_entry *entry,
 		/*
 		 * Some hardware use a different calculation for the base address
 		 * when access_type == ACCESS_LOCAL. On the these systems
-		 * ACCCESS_LOCAL refers to an address in the same BAR as the
+		 * ACCESS_LOCAL refers to an address in the same BAR as the
 		 * header but at a fixed offset. But as the header address was
 		 * supplied to the driver, we don't know which BAR it was in.
 		 * So search for the bar whose range includes the header address.
-- 
2.45.2

On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:17:04 +0800, WangYuli wrote:

> There is a spelling mistake of 'ACCCESS_LOCAL' which should be
> 'ACCESS_LOCAL'.
> 
> 


Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local
review-ilpo branch. Note it will show up in the public
platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo branch only once I've pushed my
local branch there, which might take a while.

The list of commits applied:
[1/1] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Correct the typo 'ACCCESS_LOCAL'
      commit: 31440fe70167a1014f2433eb64b9888a24b30fd3

--
 i.