drivers/w1/masters/matrox_w1.c | 10 +++------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
The .remove function can only be called if the .probe() succeeds. So there
is no need to keep track of a successful probe in 'found'.
Simplify code accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
---
Compile tested only
---
drivers/w1/masters/matrox_w1.c | 10 +++-------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/w1/masters/matrox_w1.c b/drivers/w1/masters/matrox_w1.c
index 2852cd2dc67c..146fa7c6e74e 100644
--- a/drivers/w1/masters/matrox_w1.c
+++ b/drivers/w1/masters/matrox_w1.c
@@ -47,7 +47,6 @@ struct matrox_device {
unsigned long phys_addr;
void __iomem *virt_addr;
- unsigned long found;
struct w1_bus_master *bus_master;
};
@@ -158,8 +157,6 @@ static int matrox_w1_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent
pci_set_drvdata(pdev, dev);
- dev->found = 1;
-
dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Matrox G400 GPIO transport layer for 1-wire.\n");
return 0;
@@ -176,10 +173,9 @@ static void matrox_w1_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
struct matrox_device *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
- if (dev->found) {
- w1_remove_master_device(dev->bus_master);
- iounmap(dev->virt_addr);
- }
+ w1_remove_master_device(dev->bus_master);
+ iounmap(dev->virt_addr);
+
kfree(dev);
}
--
2.50.1
On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 12:02:21 +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > The .remove function can only be called if the .probe() succeeds. So there > is no need to keep track of a successful probe in 'found'. > > Simplify code accordingly. > > Applied, thanks! [1/1] w1: matrox: Remove some deadcode in matrox_w1_remove() https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux-w1/c/25fb0ea986dc10e05f3f4b43cabde4d1853a1fd7 Best regards, -- Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
On 21/08/2025 12:02, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > The .remove function can only be called if the .probe() succeeds. So there > is no need to keep track of a successful probe in 'found'. > > Simplify code accordingly. > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> > --- > Compile tested only > --- > drivers/w1/masters/matrox_w1.c | 10 +++------- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/w1/masters/matrox_w1.c b/drivers/w1/masters/matrox_w1.c > index 2852cd2dc67c..146fa7c6e74e 100644 > --- a/drivers/w1/masters/matrox_w1.c > +++ b/drivers/w1/masters/matrox_w1.c > @@ -47,7 +47,6 @@ struct matrox_device { > > unsigned long phys_addr; > void __iomem *virt_addr; > - unsigned long found; > > struct w1_bus_master *bus_master; > }; > @@ -158,8 +157,6 @@ static int matrox_w1_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent > > pci_set_drvdata(pdev, dev); > > - dev->found = 1; What wonderful code was this... Good catch, I'll apply it soon. Best regards, Krzysztof
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.