Hi Everyone, This patch series redefines the thermal netlink API to be somewhat more convenient to use on the caller side and drops some unused code from the thermal netlink library. Please refer to the individual patch changelogs for details. Thanks!
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 9:02 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > This patch series redefines the thermal netlink API to be somewhat more > convenient to use on the caller side and drops some unused code from > the thermal netlink library. > > Please refer to the individual patch changelogs for details. No feedback, so this series doesn't appear to be controversial, and I would like to get it into 6.8. Tentatively queuing it up and please let me know if it is problematic. Thanks!
Hi Rafael, On 02/01/2024 14:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 9:02 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: >> >> Hi Everyone, >> >> This patch series redefines the thermal netlink API to be somewhat more >> convenient to use on the caller side and drops some unused code from >> the thermal netlink library. >> >> Please refer to the individual patch changelogs for details. > > No feedback, so this series doesn't appear to be controversial, and I > would like to get it into 6.8. > > Tentatively queuing it up and please let me know if it is problematic. I did not have time to review them properly and I'm OoO until next week. Is it possible to wait for the next time so I can review them ? -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Hi Daniel, On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 10:54 AM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: > > > Hi Rafael, > > On 02/01/2024 14:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 9:02 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Everyone, > >> > >> This patch series redefines the thermal netlink API to be somewhat more > >> convenient to use on the caller side and drops some unused code from > >> the thermal netlink library. > >> > >> Please refer to the individual patch changelogs for details. > > > > No feedback, so this series doesn't appear to be controversial, and I > > would like to get it into 6.8. > > > > Tentatively queuing it up and please let me know if it is problematic. > > I did not have time to review them properly and I'm OoO until next week. > Is it possible to wait for the next time so I can review them ? I can defer them a few days of course, but if Lukasz can review them in the meantime, I think that should be sufficient?
Hi Rafael, On 1/2/24 13:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 9:02 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: >> >> Hi Everyone, >> >> This patch series redefines the thermal netlink API to be somewhat more >> convenient to use on the caller side and drops some unused code from >> the thermal netlink library. >> >> Please refer to the individual patch changelogs for details. > > No feedback, so this series doesn't appear to be controversial, and I > would like to get it into 6.8. > > Tentatively queuing it up and please let me know if it is problematic. > > Thanks! > I agree, these are not controversial patches, so IMO queuing them is OK. I took a glance at them, but I can do the proper review today if you like. Regards, Lukasz
Hi Lukasz, On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 9:10 AM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > On 1/2/24 13:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 9:02 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Everyone, > >> > >> This patch series redefines the thermal netlink API to be somewhat more > >> convenient to use on the caller side and drops some unused code from > >> the thermal netlink library. > >> > >> Please refer to the individual patch changelogs for details. > > > > No feedback, so this series doesn't appear to be controversial, and I > > would like to get it into 6.8. > > > > Tentatively queuing it up and please let me know if it is problematic. > > > > Thanks! > > > > I agree, these are not controversial patches, so IMO queuing them is OK. > I took a glance at them, but I can do the proper review today if you > like. Well, if you can allocate some time for that, it would be appreciated!
On 1/3/24 10:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi Lukasz, > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 9:10 AM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Rafael, >> >> On 1/2/24 13:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 9:02 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Everyone, >>>> >>>> This patch series redefines the thermal netlink API to be somewhat more >>>> convenient to use on the caller side and drops some unused code from >>>> the thermal netlink library. >>>> >>>> Please refer to the individual patch changelogs for details. >>> >>> No feedback, so this series doesn't appear to be controversial, and I >>> would like to get it into 6.8. >>> >>> Tentatively queuing it up and please let me know if it is problematic. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >> >> I agree, these are not controversial patches, so IMO queuing them is OK. >> I took a glance at them, but I can do the proper review today if you >> like. > > Well, if you can allocate some time for that, it would be appreciated! Sure, no problem, I'll do that today.
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.