drivers/hid/hid-alps.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
If the .remove function of a 'hid_driver' is NULL, the default behavior is
to call hid_hw_stop().
So alps_remove() can be removed here, it is just hand-writing what
already exists.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
---
drivers/hid/hid-alps.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-alps.c b/drivers/hid/hid-alps.c
index db146d0f7937..669d769ea1dc 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-alps.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-alps.c
@@ -820,11 +820,6 @@ static int alps_probe(struct hid_device *hdev, const struct hid_device_id *id)
return 0;
}
-static void alps_remove(struct hid_device *hdev)
-{
- hid_hw_stop(hdev);
-}
-
static const struct hid_device_id alps_id[] = {
{ HID_DEVICE(HID_BUS_ANY, HID_GROUP_ANY,
USB_VENDOR_ID_ALPS_JP, HID_DEVICE_ID_ALPS_U1_DUAL) },
@@ -842,7 +837,6 @@ static struct hid_driver alps_driver = {
.name = "hid-alps",
.id_table = alps_id,
.probe = alps_probe,
- .remove = alps_remove,
.raw_event = alps_raw_event,
.input_mapping = alps_input_mapping,
.input_configured = alps_input_configured,
--
2.34.1
Hi Christophe! On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 04:38:26PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > If the .remove function of a 'hid_driver' is NULL, the default behavior is > to call hid_hw_stop(). > > So alps_remove() can be removed here, it is just hand-writing what > already exists. > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> > --- There is already a patch out there :-) https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220915123438.520775-1-marcus.folkesson@gmail.com/ Best regards, Marcus Folkesson
Le 03/10/2022 à 17:40, Marcus Folkesson a écrit : > Hi Christophe! > > On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 04:38:26PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: >> If the .remove function of a 'hid_driver' is NULL, the default behavior is >> to call hid_hw_stop(). >> >> So alps_remove() can be removed here, it is just hand-writing what >> already exists. >> >> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> >> --- > > > There is already a patch out there :-) Great, But I always find it funny when something that is there since many years (819d64e51d62 - 2016-06-23) is fixed twice in a row from unrelated work! CJ > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220915123438.520775-1-marcus.folkesson@gmail.com/ > > Best regards, > Marcus Folkesson
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.