net/sunrpc/addr.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
The intent is to check if the strings' are truncated or not. So, >= should
be used instead of >, because strlcat() and snprintf() return the length of
the output, excluding the trailing NULL.
Fixes: a02d69261134 ("SUNRPC: Provide functions for managing universal addresses")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
---
v2: Fix cut'n'paste typo in subject
Add net in [PATCH...]
---
net/sunrpc/addr.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/addr.c b/net/sunrpc/addr.c
index d435bffc6199..97ff11973c49 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/addr.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/addr.c
@@ -284,10 +284,10 @@ char *rpc_sockaddr2uaddr(const struct sockaddr *sap, gfp_t gfp_flags)
}
if (snprintf(portbuf, sizeof(portbuf),
- ".%u.%u", port >> 8, port & 0xff) > (int)sizeof(portbuf))
+ ".%u.%u", port >> 8, port & 0xff) >= (int)sizeof(portbuf))
return NULL;
- if (strlcat(addrbuf, portbuf, sizeof(addrbuf)) > sizeof(addrbuf))
+ if (strlcat(addrbuf, portbuf, sizeof(addrbuf)) >= sizeof(addrbuf))
return NULL;
return kstrdup(addrbuf, gfp_flags);
--
2.32.0
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 11:58:20PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> The intent is to check if the strings' are truncated or not. So, >= should
> be used instead of >, because strlcat() and snprintf() return the length of
> the output, excluding the trailing NULL.
>
> Fixes: a02d69261134 ("SUNRPC: Provide functions for managing universal addresses")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Hi Christophe -
Should these two be taken via the NFS client tree or do you intend
to include them in some other tree?
> ---
> v2: Fix cut'n'paste typo in subject
> Add net in [PATCH...]
> ---
> net/sunrpc/addr.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/addr.c b/net/sunrpc/addr.c
> index d435bffc6199..97ff11973c49 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/addr.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/addr.c
> @@ -284,10 +284,10 @@ char *rpc_sockaddr2uaddr(const struct sockaddr *sap, gfp_t gfp_flags)
> }
>
> if (snprintf(portbuf, sizeof(portbuf),
> - ".%u.%u", port >> 8, port & 0xff) > (int)sizeof(portbuf))
> + ".%u.%u", port >> 8, port & 0xff) >= (int)sizeof(portbuf))
> return NULL;
>
> - if (strlcat(addrbuf, portbuf, sizeof(addrbuf)) > sizeof(addrbuf))
> + if (strlcat(addrbuf, portbuf, sizeof(addrbuf)) >= sizeof(addrbuf))
> return NULL;
>
> return kstrdup(addrbuf, gfp_flags);
> --
> 2.32.0
>
--
Chuck Lever
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:30:51 -0400 Chuck Lever wrote: > Should these two be taken via the NFS client tree or do you intend > to include them in some other tree? FWIW we're not intending to take these. If only get_maintainer understood tree designations :(
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 09:28:29AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:30:51 -0400 Chuck Lever wrote: > > Should these two be taken via the NFS client tree or do you intend > > to include them in some other tree? > > FWIW we're not intending to take these. If only get_maintainer > understood tree designations :( I accidentally markedt his NFS patch as net on Oct 11 as well. :/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/356fb42c-9cf1-45cd-9233-ac845c507fb7@moroto.mountain/ regards, dan carpenter
On 24 Oct 2023, at 17:58, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> The intent is to check if the strings' are truncated or not. So, >= should
> be used instead of >, because strlcat() and snprintf() return the length of
> the output, excluding the trailing NULL.
>
> Fixes: a02d69261134 ("SUNRPC: Provide functions for managing universal addresses")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> ---
> v2: Fix cut'n'paste typo in subject
> Add net in [PATCH...]
> ---
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Ben
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.