fs/afs/inode.c | 2 ++ fs/afs/write.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Enable multipage folio support for the afs filesystem. This is on top of
Matthew Wilcox's for-next branch.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
---
fs/afs/inode.c | 2 ++
fs/afs/write.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/afs/inode.c b/fs/afs/inode.c
index 5964f8aee090..7dc7eb5f8e63 100644
--- a/fs/afs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/afs/inode.c
@@ -96,12 +96,14 @@ static int afs_inode_init_from_status(struct afs_operation *op,
inode->i_op = &afs_file_inode_operations;
inode->i_fop = &afs_file_operations;
inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &afs_file_aops;
+ mapping_set_large_folios(inode->i_mapping);
break;
case AFS_FTYPE_DIR:
inode->i_mode = S_IFDIR | (status->mode & S_IALLUGO);
inode->i_op = &afs_dir_inode_operations;
inode->i_fop = &afs_dir_file_operations;
inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &afs_dir_aops;
+ mapping_set_large_folios(inode->i_mapping);
break;
case AFS_FTYPE_SYMLINK:
/* Symlinks with a mode of 0644 are actually mountpoints. */
diff --git a/fs/afs/write.c b/fs/afs/write.c
index 5e9157d0da29..d6cc0fa44316 100644
--- a/fs/afs/write.c
+++ b/fs/afs/write.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int afs_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
goto flush_conflicting_write;
}
- *_page = &folio->page;
+ *_page = folio_file_page(folio, pos / PAGE_SIZE);
_leave(" = 0");
return 0;
Hi David,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on dhowells-fs/fscache-next]
[also build test ERROR on linux/master linus/master]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/David-Howells/afs-Enable-multipage-folio-support/20220226-075436
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git fscache-next
config: i386-randconfig-a005 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220226/202202261524.4tAqmT0a-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/91637acf6da0c809e1bedc59696d6bc0a8604f03
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review David-Howells/afs-Enable-multipage-folio-support/20220226-075436
git checkout 91637acf6da0c809e1bedc59696d6bc0a8604f03
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<):
>> ERROR: modpost: "PageHeadHuge" [fs/afs/kafs.ko] undefined!
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 11:53:46PM +0000, David Howells wrote: > Enable multipage folio support for the afs filesystem. This is on top of > Matthew Wilcox's for-next branch. > > Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> > cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> > cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> > cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org I can't say that I've audited AFS for its correct use of folios everywhere, but since you've tested it, I have no objections: Acked-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.