drivers/thermal/uniphier_thermal.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
It is generally inefficient to iterate over trip indices and call
thermal_zone_get_trip() every time to get the struct thermal_trip
corresponding to the given trip index, so modify the uniphier thermal
driver to use thermal_zone_for_each_trip() for walking trips.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/thermal/uniphier_thermal.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/thermal/uniphier_thermal.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/thermal/uniphier_thermal.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/thermal/uniphier_thermal.c
@@ -239,13 +239,32 @@ static irqreturn_t uniphier_tm_alarm_irq
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
+struct trip_walk_data {
+ struct uniphier_tm_dev *tdev;
+ int crit_temp;
+ int index;
+};
+
+static int uniphier_tm_trip_walk_cb(struct thermal_trip *trip, void *arg)
+{
+ struct trip_walk_data *twd = arg;
+
+ if (trip->type == THERMAL_TRIP_CRITICAL &&
+ trip->temperature < twd->crit_temp)
+ twd->crit_temp = trip->temperature;
+
+ uniphier_tm_set_alert(twd->tdev, twd->index, trip->temperature);
+ twd->tdev->alert_en[twd->index++] = true;
+}
+
static int uniphier_tm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
+ struct trip_walk_data twd = { .crit_temp = INT_MAX, .index = 0 };
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct regmap *regmap;
struct device_node *parent;
struct uniphier_tm_dev *tdev;
- int i, ret, irq, crit_temp = INT_MAX;
+ int i, ret, irq;
tdev = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tdev), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tdev)
@@ -293,20 +312,10 @@ static int uniphier_tm_probe(struct plat
}
/* set alert temperatures */
- for (i = 0; i < thermal_zone_get_num_trips(tdev->tz_dev); i++) {
- struct thermal_trip trip;
+ twd.tdev = tdev;
+ thermal_zone_for_each_trip(tdev->tz_dev, uniphier_tm_trip_walk_cb, &twd);
- ret = thermal_zone_get_trip(tdev->tz_dev, i, &trip);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- if (trip.type == THERMAL_TRIP_CRITICAL &&
- trip.temperature < crit_temp)
- crit_temp = trip.temperature;
- uniphier_tm_set_alert(tdev, i, trip.temperature);
- tdev->alert_en[i] = true;
- }
- if (crit_temp > CRITICAL_TEMP_LIMIT) {
+ if (twd.crit_temp > CRITICAL_TEMP_LIMIT) {
dev_err(dev, "critical trip is over limit(>%d), or not set\n",
CRITICAL_TEMP_LIMIT);
return -EINVAL;
Hi Rafael,
On 2024/06/18 3:07, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> It is generally inefficient to iterate over trip indices and call
> thermal_zone_get_trip() every time to get the struct thermal_trip
> corresponding to the given trip index, so modify the uniphier thermal
> driver to use thermal_zone_for_each_trip() for walking trips.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/uniphier_thermal.c | 37
> +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/thermal/uniphier_thermal.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/thermal/uniphier_thermal.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/thermal/uniphier_thermal.c
> @@ -239,13 +239,32 @@ static irqreturn_t uniphier_tm_alarm_irq
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> +struct trip_walk_data {
> + struct uniphier_tm_dev *tdev;
> + int crit_temp;
> + int index;
> +};
> +
> +static int uniphier_tm_trip_walk_cb(struct thermal_trip *trip, void *arg)
> +{
> + struct trip_walk_data *twd = arg;
> +
> + if (trip->type == THERMAL_TRIP_CRITICAL &&
> + trip->temperature < twd->crit_temp)
> + twd->crit_temp = trip->temperature;
> +
> + uniphier_tm_set_alert(twd->tdev, twd->index, trip->temperature);
> + twd->tdev->alert_en[twd->index++] = true;
> +}
> +
> static int uniphier_tm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> + struct trip_walk_data twd = { .crit_temp = INT_MAX, .index = 0 };
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct regmap *regmap;
> struct device_node *parent;
> struct uniphier_tm_dev *tdev;
> - int i, ret, irq, crit_temp = INT_MAX;
> + int i, ret, irq;
>
> tdev = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!tdev)
> @@ -293,20 +312,10 @@ static int uniphier_tm_probe(struct plat
> }
>
> /* set alert temperatures */
> - for (i = 0; i < thermal_zone_get_num_trips(tdev->tz_dev); i++) {
> - struct thermal_trip trip;
> + twd.tdev = tdev;
> + thermal_zone_for_each_trip(tdev->tz_dev, uniphier_tm_trip_walk_cb, &twd);
>
> - ret = thermal_zone_get_trip(tdev->tz_dev, i, &trip);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - if (trip.type == THERMAL_TRIP_CRITICAL &&
> - trip.temperature < crit_temp)
> - crit_temp = trip.temperature;
> - uniphier_tm_set_alert(tdev, i, trip.temperature);
> - tdev->alert_en[i] = true;
> - }
> - if (crit_temp > CRITICAL_TEMP_LIMIT) {
> + if (twd.crit_temp > CRITICAL_TEMP_LIMIT) {
> dev_err(dev, "critical trip is over limit(>%d), or not set\n",
> CRITICAL_TEMP_LIMIT);
> return -EINVAL;
I confirmed the updated code using the helper function is equivalent
to the original.
Reviewed-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
Thank you,
---
Best Regards
Kunihiko Hayashi
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 6:05 AM Kunihiko Hayashi
<hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On 2024/06/18 3:07, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >
> > It is generally inefficient to iterate over trip indices and call
> > thermal_zone_get_trip() every time to get the struct thermal_trip
> > corresponding to the given trip index, so modify the uniphier thermal
> > driver to use thermal_zone_for_each_trip() for walking trips.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/thermal/uniphier_thermal.c | 37
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-pm/drivers/thermal/uniphier_thermal.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/thermal/uniphier_thermal.c
> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/thermal/uniphier_thermal.c
> > @@ -239,13 +239,32 @@ static irqreturn_t uniphier_tm_alarm_irq
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > }
> >
> > +struct trip_walk_data {
> > + struct uniphier_tm_dev *tdev;
> > + int crit_temp;
> > + int index;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int uniphier_tm_trip_walk_cb(struct thermal_trip *trip, void *arg)
> > +{
> > + struct trip_walk_data *twd = arg;
> > +
> > + if (trip->type == THERMAL_TRIP_CRITICAL &&
> > + trip->temperature < twd->crit_temp)
> > + twd->crit_temp = trip->temperature;
> > +
> > + uniphier_tm_set_alert(twd->tdev, twd->index, trip->temperature);
> > + twd->tdev->alert_en[twd->index++] = true;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int uniphier_tm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > + struct trip_walk_data twd = { .crit_temp = INT_MAX, .index = 0 };
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > struct regmap *regmap;
> > struct device_node *parent;
> > struct uniphier_tm_dev *tdev;
> > - int i, ret, irq, crit_temp = INT_MAX;
> > + int i, ret, irq;
> >
> > tdev = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!tdev)
> > @@ -293,20 +312,10 @@ static int uniphier_tm_probe(struct plat
> > }
> >
> > /* set alert temperatures */
> > - for (i = 0; i < thermal_zone_get_num_trips(tdev->tz_dev); i++) {
> > - struct thermal_trip trip;
> > + twd.tdev = tdev;
> > + thermal_zone_for_each_trip(tdev->tz_dev, uniphier_tm_trip_walk_cb, &twd);
> >
> > - ret = thermal_zone_get_trip(tdev->tz_dev, i, &trip);
> > - if (ret)
> > - return ret;
> > -
> > - if (trip.type == THERMAL_TRIP_CRITICAL &&
> > - trip.temperature < crit_temp)
> > - crit_temp = trip.temperature;
> > - uniphier_tm_set_alert(tdev, i, trip.temperature);
> > - tdev->alert_en[i] = true;
> > - }
> > - if (crit_temp > CRITICAL_TEMP_LIMIT) {
> > + if (twd.crit_temp > CRITICAL_TEMP_LIMIT) {
> > dev_err(dev, "critical trip is over limit(>%d), or not set\n",
> > CRITICAL_TEMP_LIMIT);
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> I confirmed the updated code using the helper function is equivalent
> to the original.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
Thank you!
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.