[PATCH 0/7] usb9pfs: stable fixes

Michael Grzeschik posted 7 patches 2 days, 18 hours ago
net/9p/trans_usbg.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
[PATCH 0/7] usb9pfs: stable fixes
Posted by Michael Grzeschik 2 days, 18 hours ago
This is a breakout series with some additional fixes of the
first series of fixes I did sent out earlier this year.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260319-9pfixes-v1-0-c977a7433185@pengutronix.de/

It only addresses the stability of the driver and left out
the interface rework. Therefor I put all changes into a new
series beginning as v1.

Signed-off-by: Michael Grzeschik <mgr@kernel.org>
---
Hyungjung Joo (1):
      net/9p/usbg: clear stale client pointer on close

Michael Grzeschik (6):
      net/9p/usbg: also disable endpoints on p9_usbg_close
      net/9p/usbg: set client to Disconnected on usb9pfs_disable
      net/9p/usbg: always reset completion when disconnecting
      net/9p/usbg: call disable_usb9pfs() from usb9pfs_disable()
      net/9p/usbg: fix out_req buffer leak in disable_usb9pfs
      net/9p/usbg: remove bogus context initialization in alloc_requests

 net/9p/trans_usbg.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: a170f3dfda02b6ab58bcd1caa1ac5421323a9b45
change-id: 20260922-usb9pfsfixes-e3bbdd821fc8

Best regards,
--  
Michael Grzeschik <mgr@kernel.org>
Re: [PATCH 0/7] usb9pfs: stable fixes
Posted by Dominique Martinet 2 days, 8 hours ago
Michael Grzeschik wrote on Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 12:25:53AM +0200:
> This is a breakout series with some additional fixes of the
> first series of fixes I did sent out earlier this year.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260319-9pfixes-v1-0-c977a7433185@pengutronix.de/
> 
> It only addresses the stability of the driver and left out
> the interface rework. Therefor I put all changes into a new
> series beginning as v1.

Thanks!
Also thanks for picking up a patch I had missed earlier.
This didn't apply cleanly but nothing a fuzzy `patch` command couldn't
handle (unfortunately sashiko gives up too easily on the whole
series... but there's nothing controversial in here anyway so I won't
ask you to resend)

I fixed a typo in one of the messages but that aside this looks good to
me, I've picked this up and will send to -next in a bit

-- 
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus