[PATCH v2 0/6] iio: adc: ade9000: add ADE9430 support

Antoniu Miclaus posted 6 patches 6 days, 16 hours ago
.../bindings/iio/adc/adi,ade9000.yaml         | 22 ++++++-----
Documentation/iio/ade9000.rst                 | 36 +++++++++--------
drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig                       |  1 +
drivers/iio/adc/ade9000.c                     | 39 ++++++++++++++++---
4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
[PATCH v2 0/6] iio: adc: ade9000: add ADE9430 support
Posted by Antoniu Miclaus 6 days, 16 hours ago
The ADE9430 is a polyphase energy metering device from the same family as
the ADE9000. It is register-compatible with the ADE9000 but omits the
on-chip dip/swell detection and has no on-chip digital integrator; it
relies on an external analog integrator for Rogowski coil current sensors.

This series adds ADE9430 support to the existing ade9000 driver, reusing
the dip/swell-less channel table introduced for the ADE9078 and adding a
matching chip_info for the ADE9430 full-scale codes. A precursor patch
gates the DICOEFF register write behind a has_digital_integrator chip_info
flag so it is skipped on parts without an on-chip digital integrator.

Patches 1 and 2 are standalone fixes carried with this series. Patch 1
corrects the ADE9000 full-scale RMS/PCF codes to the same family-A values
the ADE9430 uses. Patch 2 fixes the DIPC event never being handled or
cleared, found by the sashiko review of v1. Both carry Fixes: tags and can
be applied independently of the rest of the series.

Changes in v2:
- new patch: fix the DIPC event never being handled or cleared, found by
  the sashiko review of v1 (patch 2).
- new precursor patch: gate the DICOEFF write behind a has_digital_integrator
  chip_info flag, split out of the ADE9430 support patch.
- reuse ade9078_channels for the ADE9430 instead of adding a duplicate
  channel table.
- reword the documentation intro to "The supported parts are..." so it does
  not need updating for each new part.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20260907101623.8730-1-antoniu.miclaus@analog.com/

Antoniu Miclaus (6):
  iio: adc: ade9000: fix ADE9000 full-scale RMS and PCF codes
  iio: adc: ade9000: fix DIPC event never being handled or cleared
  dt-bindings: iio: adc: adi,ade9000: add adi,ade9430 compatible
  iio: adc: ade9000: gate the DICOEFF write behind a chip_info flag
  iio: adc: ade9000: add support for ADE9430
  docs: iio: ade9000: document ADE9430 support

 .../bindings/iio/adc/adi,ade9000.yaml         | 22 ++++++-----
 Documentation/iio/ade9000.rst                 | 36 +++++++++--------
 drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig                       |  1 +
 drivers/iio/adc/ade9000.c                     | 39 ++++++++++++++++---
 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)


base-commit: edb91bc566576f6664a3efbad6bd4205aa1d5259
-- 
2.43.0
Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] iio: adc: ade9000: add ADE9430 support
Posted by Nuno Sá 6 days, 8 hours ago
On Fri, 2026-09-18 at 10:35 +0300, Antoniu Miclaus wrote:
> The ADE9430 is a polyphase energy metering device from the same family as
> the ADE9000. It is register-compatible with the ADE9000 but omits the
> on-chip dip/swell detection and has no on-chip digital integrator; it
> relies on an external analog integrator for Rogowski coil current sensors.
> 
> This series adds ADE9430 support to the existing ade9000 driver, reusing
> the dip/swell-less channel table introduced for the ADE9078 and adding a
> matching chip_info for the ADE9430 full-scale codes. A precursor patch
> gates the DICOEFF register write behind a has_digital_integrator chip_info
> flag so it is skipped on parts without an on-chip digital integrator.
> 
> Patches 1 and 2 are standalone fixes carried with this series. Patch 1
> corrects the ADE9000 full-scale RMS/PCF codes to the same family-A values
> the ADE9430 uses. Patch 2 fixes the DIPC event never being handled or
> cleared, found by the sashiko review of v1. Both carry Fixes: tags and can
> be applied independently of the rest of the series.
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - new patch: fix the DIPC event never being handled or cleared, found by
>   the sashiko review of v1 (patch 2).
> - new precursor patch: gate the DICOEFF write behind a has_digital_integrator
>   chip_info flag, split out of the ADE9430 support patch.
> - reuse ade9078_channels for the ADE9430 instead of adding a duplicate
>   channel table.
> - reword the documentation intro to "The supported parts are..." so it does
>   not need updating for each new part.
> 
> v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20260907101623.8730-1-antoniu.miclaus@analog.com/
> 
> Antoniu Miclaus (6):
>   iio: adc: ade9000: fix ADE9000 full-scale RMS and PCF codes
>   iio: adc: ade9000: fix DIPC event never being handled or cleared
>   dt-bindings: iio: adc: adi,ade9000: add adi,ade9430 compatible
>   iio: adc: ade9000: gate the DICOEFF write behind a chip_info flag
>   iio: adc: ade9000: add support for ADE9430
>   docs: iio: ade9000: document ADE9430 support
> 
>  .../bindings/iio/adc/adi,ade9000.yaml         | 22 ++++++-----
>  Documentation/iio/ade9000.rst                 | 36 +++++++++--------
>  drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig                       |  1 +
>  drivers/iio/adc/ade9000.c                     | 39 ++++++++++++++++---
>  4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> base-commit: edb91bc566576f6664a3efbad6bd4205aa1d5259

LGTM

Reviewed-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] iio: adc: ade9000: add ADE9430 support
Posted by Jonathan Cameron 4 days ago
On Fri, 18 Sep 2026 16:27:30 +0100
Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2026-09-18 at 10:35 +0300, Antoniu Miclaus wrote:
> > The ADE9430 is a polyphase energy metering device from the same family as
> > the ADE9000. It is register-compatible with the ADE9000 but omits the
> > on-chip dip/swell detection and has no on-chip digital integrator; it
> > relies on an external analog integrator for Rogowski coil current sensors.
> > 
> > This series adds ADE9430 support to the existing ade9000 driver, reusing
> > the dip/swell-less channel table introduced for the ADE9078 and adding a
> > matching chip_info for the ADE9430 full-scale codes. A precursor patch
> > gates the DICOEFF register write behind a has_digital_integrator chip_info
> > flag so it is skipped on parts without an on-chip digital integrator.
> > 
> > Patches 1 and 2 are standalone fixes carried with this series. Patch 1
> > corrects the ADE9000 full-scale RMS/PCF codes to the same family-A values
> > the ADE9430 uses. Patch 2 fixes the DIPC event never being handled or
> > cleared, found by the sashiko review of v1. Both carry Fixes: tags and can
> > be applied independently of the rest of the series.
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> > - new patch: fix the DIPC event never being handled or cleared, found by
> >   the sashiko review of v1 (patch 2).
> > - new precursor patch: gate the DICOEFF write behind a has_digital_integrator
> >   chip_info flag, split out of the ADE9430 support patch.
> > - reuse ade9078_channels for the ADE9430 instead of adding a duplicate
> >   channel table.
> > - reword the documentation intro to "The supported parts are..." so it does
> >   not need updating for each new part.
> > 
> > v1:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20260907101623.8730-1-antoniu.miclaus@analog.com/
> > 
> > Antoniu Miclaus (6):
> >   iio: adc: ade9000: fix ADE9000 full-scale RMS and PCF codes
> >   iio: adc: ade9000: fix DIPC event never being handled or cleared
> >   dt-bindings: iio: adc: adi,ade9000: add adi,ade9430 compatible
> >   iio: adc: ade9000: gate the DICOEFF write behind a chip_info flag
> >   iio: adc: ade9000: add support for ADE9430
> >   docs: iio: ade9000: document ADE9430 support
> > 
> >  .../bindings/iio/adc/adi,ade9000.yaml         | 22 ++++++-----
> >  Documentation/iio/ade9000.rst                 | 36 +++++++++--------
> >  drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig                       |  1 +
> >  drivers/iio/adc/ade9000.c                     | 39 ++++++++++++++++---
> >  4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> > 
> > 
> > base-commit: edb91bc566576f6664a3efbad6bd4205aa1d5259  
> 
> LGTM
> 
> Reviewed-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
LGTM2.  Just need to give some time for dt-binding reviewers to
take a look.

Thanks,

J