mm/damon/sysfs.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
damon_sysfs_turn_damon_on() ignored the return value of damon_call()
for the repeat call control registration and always returned the stale
result of damon_start() (0 at that point). When damon_call() fails,
e.g., the kdamond is already exiting, the user still gets success from
the state file write while monitoring is not actually on.
Save and return the damon_call() result instead. No rollback of
damon_start() is needed since a failed damon_call() guarantees the
context is stopped.
Signed-off-by: Xuewen Wang <wangxuewen@kylinos.cn>
---
mm/damon/sysfs.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/damon/sysfs.c b/mm/damon/sysfs.c
index e3858ffab4b2..beb4bdc74460 100644
--- a/mm/damon/sysfs.c
+++ b/mm/damon/sysfs.c
@@ -2280,7 +2280,8 @@ static int damon_sysfs_turn_damon_on(struct damon_sysfs_kdamond *kdamond)
repeat_call_control->data = kdamond;
repeat_call_control->repeat = true;
repeat_call_control->dealloc_on_cancel = true;
- if (damon_call(ctx, repeat_call_control))
+ err = damon_call(ctx, repeat_call_control);
+ if (err)
kfree(repeat_call_control);
return err;
}
--
2.25.1
On Tue, 15 Sep 2026 17:39:28 +0800 Xuewen Wang <wangxuewen@kylinos.cn> wrote: > damon_sysfs_turn_damon_on() ignored the return value of damon_call() > for the repeat call control registration and always returned the stale > result of damon_start() (0 at that point). When damon_call() fails, > e.g., the kdamond is already exiting, the user still gets success from > the state file write while monitoring is not actually on. > > Save and return the damon_call() result instead. No rollback of > damon_start() is needed since a failed damon_call() guarantees the > context is stopped. Nice catch, thank you for fixing this! > > Signed-off-by: Xuewen Wang <wangxuewen@kylinos.cn> Reviewed-by: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org> This patch is applied to damon/next [1] tree. If this patch is not added to mm.git in short term (~1 week?), I will ask mm.git maintainer (Andrew Morton) to pick this. So, no action from your side is needed for now. If it seems I also forgot doing that or you cannot wait for my action, please feel free to directly ask that to Andrew. [1] https://origin.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/mm/damon/maintainer-profile.html#scm-trees Thanks, SJ [...]
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.