drivers/edac/ie31200_edac.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
ie31200_init_one() enables the PCI device before calling ie31200_probe1().
If probing fails, it returns without balancing the successful enable,
leaving the PCI enable count elevated.
Call pci_disable_device() on that failure path. This also covers the
direct ie31200_init_one() call from the module initialization fallback,
while preserving the existing return values and successful probe path.
This issue was identified during our ongoing static-analysis research while
reviewing kernel code.
Assisted-by: OpenAI:GPT-5.6
Co-developed-by: Ijae Kim <ae878000@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ijae Kim <ae878000@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Myeonghun Pak <mhun512@gmail.com>
---
drivers/edac/ie31200_edac.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/ie31200_edac.c b/drivers/edac/ie31200_edac.c
index 6f5fdf43e7732cd23d54dc8392caed4ca7990fcd..88af77ee07fe367f692a89dd55f188aefe912e44 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/ie31200_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/ie31200_edac.c
@@ -660,7 +660,9 @@ static int ie31200_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev,
if (pci_enable_device(pdev) < 0)
return -EIO;
rc = ie31200_probe1(pdev, (struct res_config *)ent->driver_data);
- if (rc == 0 && !mci_pdev)
+ if (rc)
+ pci_disable_device(pdev);
+ else if (!mci_pdev)
mci_pdev = pci_dev_get(pdev);
return rc;
> ie31200_init_one() enables the PCI device before calling ie31200_probe1(). > If probing fails, it returns without balancing the successful enable, > leaving the PCI enable count elevated. > > Call pci_disable_device() on that failure path. This also covers the > direct ie31200_init_one() call from the module initialization fallback, > while preserving the existing return values and successful probe path. > > This issue was identified during our ongoing static-analysis research while > reviewing kernel code. > > Assisted-by: OpenAI:GPT-5.6 I added "LLM" to this tag based on current guidance in Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst > Co-developed-by: Ijae Kim <ae878000@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Ijae Kim <ae878000@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Myeonghun Pak <mhun512@gmail.com> Applied. Thanks. -Tony
On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 04:51:07PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > Assisted-by: OpenAI:GPT-5.6
>
> I added "LLM" to this tag based on current guidance in Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst
Nah, it needs to be only LLM:
"Assisted-by: LLM"
because
commit 816d9992d9ed434ec52cfbd63080d518e535a41b
Author: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Date: Wed Jul 1 17:54:48 2026 +0200
coding-assistants: simplify attribution
The requirement to identify specific models used in the Assisted-by tag
provides free advertising to proprietary software companies while adding
little or no useful information. Change the requirement to simply:
Assisted-by: LLM
to capture the fact that an LLM was used without tracking which one.
Lemme fix it up.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Thanks, Tony and Boris, for applying the patch and fixing the tag. I'll use "Assisted-by: LLM" in future submissions. Best regards, Myeonghun Pak 2026년 9월 14일 (월) 오후 8:53, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>님이 작성: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 04:51:07PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote: > > > Assisted-by: OpenAI:GPT-5.6 > > > > I added "LLM" to this tag based on current guidance in Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst > > Nah, it needs to be only LLM: > > "Assisted-by: LLM" > > because > > commit 816d9992d9ed434ec52cfbd63080d518e535a41b > Author: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> > Date: Wed Jul 1 17:54:48 2026 +0200 > > coding-assistants: simplify attribution > > The requirement to identify specific models used in the Assisted-by tag > provides free advertising to proprietary software companies while adding > little or no useful information. Change the requirement to simply: > > Assisted-by: LLM > > to capture the fact that an LLM was used without tracking which one. > > Lemme fix it up. > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 02:18:39PM -0400, Myeonghun Pak wrote:
> Thanks, Tony and Boris, for applying the patch and fixing the tag.
> I'll use "Assisted-by: LLM" in future submissions.
Also, for the future, do not top-post when replying on a public ML but put
your reply underneath the text you're replying to, like I just did.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.