kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
Add the RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN and early-boot check that the Tree version
gained, srcu_lock_sync() was already present.
Suggested-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
---
kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
index 99f8bfd98b04..76411562366f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
@@ -361,6 +361,12 @@ void synchronize_srcu_atomic(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
srcu_lock_sync(&ssp->dep_map);
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lockdep_is_held(ssp),
+ "Illegal synchronize_srcu_atomic() in same-type SRCU read-side critical section");
+
+ if (rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_INACTIVE)
+ return;
+
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPTION))
synchronize_rcu(); // Needed for RCU Tasks Trace to imply RCU grace period.
// And in Tiny RCU, it is near zero cost and doesn't block.
--
2.43.0
On 11 September 2026 17:09:13 BST, Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com> wrote: >Add the RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN and early-boot check that the Tree version >gained, srcu_lock_sync() was already present. > >Suggested-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev> Ok. Reviewed-by: Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org> >Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com> >--- > kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > >diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c >index 99f8bfd98b04..76411562366f 100644 >--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c >+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c >@@ -361,6 +361,12 @@ void synchronize_srcu_atomic(struct srcu_struct *ssp) > > srcu_lock_sync(&ssp->dep_map); > >+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lockdep_is_held(ssp), >+ "Illegal synchronize_srcu_atomic() in same-type SRCU read-side critical section"); >+ >+ if (rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_INACTIVE) >+ return; >+ Wow! > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPTION)) > synchronize_rcu(); // Needed for RCU Tasks Trace to imply RCU grace period. > // And in Tiny RCU, it is near zero cost and doesn't block. > --- Thanks! https://lore.kernel.org/all/EE579805-42F2-4C58-B752-F28779EEB717@grrlz.net/
On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 10:18:04PM +0100, Bradley Morgan wrote: > On 11 September 2026 17:09:13 BST, Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com> wrote: > >Add the RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN and early-boot check that the Tree version > >gained, srcu_lock_sync() was already present. > > > >Suggested-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev> > > Ok. > > Reviewed-by: Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org> Applied, thank you! > >Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com> > >--- > > kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > >diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c > >index 99f8bfd98b04..76411562366f 100644 > >--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c > >+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c > >@@ -361,6 +361,12 @@ void synchronize_srcu_atomic(struct srcu_struct *ssp) > > > > srcu_lock_sync(&ssp->dep_map); > > > >+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lockdep_is_held(ssp), > >+ "Illegal synchronize_srcu_atomic() in same-type SRCU read-side critical section"); > >+ > >+ if (rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_INACTIVE) > >+ return; > >+ > > Wow! If you think that this one is fun, take a look at the implementation of synchronize_rcu() in kernel/rcu/tiny.c. ;-) Thanx, Paul > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPTION)) > > synchronize_rcu(); // Needed for RCU Tasks Trace to imply RCU grace period. > > // And in Tiny RCU, it is near zero cost and doesn't block. > > > > --- Thanks! > https://lore.kernel.org/all/EE579805-42F2-4C58-B752-F28779EEB717@grrlz.net/
On 12 September 2026 00:12:25 BST, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 10:18:04PM +0100, Bradley Morgan wrote:
>> On 11 September 2026 17:09:13 BST, Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> >Add the RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN and early-boot check that the Tree version
>> >gained, srcu_lock_sync() was already present.
>> >
>> >Suggested-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>
>>
>> Ok.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>
>
>Applied, thank you!
>
>> >Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
>> >---
>> > kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c | 6 ++++++
>> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>> >
>> >diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
>> >index 99f8bfd98b04..76411562366f 100644
>> >--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
>> >+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
>> >@@ -361,6 +361,12 @@ void synchronize_srcu_atomic(struct srcu_struct
>*ssp)
>> >
>> > srcu_lock_sync(&ssp->dep_map);
>> >
>> >+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lockdep_is_held(ssp),
>> >+ "Illegal synchronize_srcu_atomic() in same-type SRCU read-side critical section");
>> >+
>> >+ if (rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_INACTIVE)
>> >+ return;
>> >+
>>
>> Wow!
>
>If you think that this one is fun, take a look at the implementation of
>synchronize_rcu() in kernel/rcu/tiny.c. ;-)
void synchronize_rcu(void)
{
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(...);
preempt_disable();
WRITE_ONCE(rcu_ctrlblk.gp_seq, rcu_ctrlblk.gp_seq + 2);
preempt_enable();
}
Hah!
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
>> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPTION))
>> > synchronize_rcu(); // Needed for RCU Tasks Trace to imply RCU grace period.
>> > // And in Tiny RCU, it is near zero cost and doesn't block.
>> >
>>
>> --- Thanks!
>>
>https://lore.kernel.org/all/EE579805-42F2-4C58-B752-F28779EEB717@grrlz.net/
--- Thanks!
https://lore.kernel.org/all/EE579805-42F2-4C58-B752-F28779EEB717@grrlz.net/
On Sat, Sep 12, 2026 at 12:09:13AM +0800, Kunwu Chan wrote: > Add the RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN and early-boot check that the Tree version > gained, srcu_lock_sync() was already present. > > Suggested-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev> > Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com> Queued for testing and review, thank you both! Thanx, Paul > --- > kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c > index 99f8bfd98b04..76411562366f 100644 > --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c > +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c > @@ -361,6 +361,12 @@ void synchronize_srcu_atomic(struct srcu_struct *ssp) > > srcu_lock_sync(&ssp->dep_map); > > + RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lockdep_is_held(ssp), > + "Illegal synchronize_srcu_atomic() in same-type SRCU read-side critical section"); > + > + if (rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_INACTIVE) > + return; > + > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPTION)) > synchronize_rcu(); // Needed for RCU Tasks Trace to imply RCU grace period. > // And in Tiny RCU, it is near zero cost and doesn't block. > -- > 2.43.0 >
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.