tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
Since commit 0389c305ef56 (“selftests/mm: skip soft-dirty tests when CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY is disabled”),
the soft-dirty test is skipped when soft-dirty is not supported.
There is therefore no reason to exclude the test from being built on
arm64. Remove the arm64-specific exclusion.
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
index 2d5366196e30..d3e9bd67904a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
@@ -104,10 +104,7 @@ TEST_GEN_FILES += guard-regions
TEST_GEN_FILES += merge
TEST_GEN_FILES += rmap
TEST_GEN_FILES += folio_split_race_test
-
-ifneq ($(ARCH),arm64)
TEST_GEN_FILES += soft-dirty
-endif
ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
CAN_BUILD_I386 := $(shell ./../x86/check_cc.sh "$(CC)" ../x86/trivial_32bit_program.c -m32)
--
LEVI:{C3F47F37-75D8-414A-A8BA-3980EC8A46D7}
On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 01:50:28PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> Since commit 0389c305ef56 (“selftests/mm: skip soft-dirty tests when CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY is disabled”),
> the soft-dirty test is skipped when soft-dirty is not supported.
>
> There is therefore no reason to exclude the test from being built on
> arm64. Remove the arm64-specific exclusion.
>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
Seems reasonable with David's suggested change applied.
Acked-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
> index 2d5366196e30..d3e9bd67904a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
> @@ -104,10 +104,7 @@ TEST_GEN_FILES += guard-regions
> TEST_GEN_FILES += merge
> TEST_GEN_FILES += rmap
> TEST_GEN_FILES += folio_split_race_test
> -
> -ifneq ($(ARCH),arm64)
> TEST_GEN_FILES += soft-dirty
> -endif
>
> ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
> CAN_BUILD_I386 := $(shell ./../x86/check_cc.sh "$(CC)" ../x86/trivial_32bit_program.c -m32)
> --
> LEVI:{C3F47F37-75D8-414A-A8BA-3980EC8A46D7}
>
--
Cheers, Lorenzo
On 9/11/26 14:50, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> Since commit 0389c305ef56 (“selftests/mm: skip soft-dirty tests when CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY is disabled”),
> the soft-dirty test is skipped when soft-dirty is not supported.
>
> There is therefore no reason to exclude the test from being built on
> arm64. Remove the arm64-specific exclusion.
>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
> index 2d5366196e30..d3e9bd67904a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
> @@ -104,10 +104,7 @@ TEST_GEN_FILES += guard-regions
> TEST_GEN_FILES += merge
> TEST_GEN_FILES += rmap
> TEST_GEN_FILES += folio_split_race_test
> -
> -ifneq ($(ARCH),arm64)
> TEST_GEN_FILES += soft-dirty
> -endif
>
> ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
> CAN_BUILD_I386 := $(shell ./../x86/check_cc.sh "$(CC)" ../x86/trivial_32bit_program.c -m32)
Does that mean we can also the following?
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
index d09f9f6a384ee..33963535616b2 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
@@ -390,10 +390,7 @@ then
CATEGORY="pkey" run_test ./protection_keys_64
fi
-if [ -x ./soft-dirty ]
-then
- CATEGORY="soft_dirty" run_test ./soft-dirty
-fi
+CATEGORY="soft_dirty" run_test ./soft-dirty
CATEGORY="pagemap" run_test ./pagemap_ioctl
--
Cheers,
David
> On 9/11/26 14:50, Yeoreum Yun wrote: > > Since commit 0389c305ef56 (“selftests/mm: skip soft-dirty tests when CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY is disabled”), > > the soft-dirty test is skipped when soft-dirty is not supported. > > > > There is therefore no reason to exclude the test from being built on > > arm64. Remove the arm64-specific exclusion. > > > > Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org> > > Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com> > > --- > > tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 3 --- > > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile > > index 2d5366196e30..d3e9bd67904a 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile > > @@ -104,10 +104,7 @@ TEST_GEN_FILES += guard-regions > > TEST_GEN_FILES += merge > > TEST_GEN_FILES += rmap > > TEST_GEN_FILES += folio_split_race_test > > - > > -ifneq ($(ARCH),arm64) > > TEST_GEN_FILES += soft-dirty > > -endif > > > > ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64) > > CAN_BUILD_I386 := $(shell ./../x86/check_cc.sh "$(CC)" ../x86/trivial_32bit_program.c -m32) > > Does that mean we can also the following? > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh > index d09f9f6a384ee..33963535616b2 100755 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh > @@ -390,10 +390,7 @@ then > CATEGORY="pkey" run_test ./protection_keys_64 > fi > > -if [ -x ./soft-dirty ] > -then > - CATEGORY="soft_dirty" run_test ./soft-dirty > -fi > +CATEGORY="soft_dirty" run_test ./soft-dirty > > CATEGORY="pagemap" run_test ./pagemap_ioctl Ah right. since all archs have the soft-dirty, we can remove the if condition. Thanks! -- Sincerely, Yeoreum Yun
On 9/11/26 18:24, Yeoreum Yun wrote: >> On 9/11/26 14:50, Yeoreum Yun wrote: >>> Since commit 0389c305ef56 (“selftests/mm: skip soft-dirty tests when CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY is disabled”), >>> the soft-dirty test is skipped when soft-dirty is not supported. >>> >>> There is therefore no reason to exclude the test from being built on >>> arm64. Remove the arm64-specific exclusion. >>> >>> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org> >>> Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com> >>> --- >>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 3 --- >>> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile >>> index 2d5366196e30..d3e9bd67904a 100644 >>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile >>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile >>> @@ -104,10 +104,7 @@ TEST_GEN_FILES += guard-regions >>> TEST_GEN_FILES += merge >>> TEST_GEN_FILES += rmap >>> TEST_GEN_FILES += folio_split_race_test >>> - >>> -ifneq ($(ARCH),arm64) >>> TEST_GEN_FILES += soft-dirty >>> -endif >>> >>> ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64) >>> CAN_BUILD_I386 := $(shell ./../x86/check_cc.sh "$(CC)" ../x86/trivial_32bit_program.c -m32) >> >> Does that mean we can also the following? >> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh >> index d09f9f6a384ee..33963535616b2 100755 >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh >> @@ -390,10 +390,7 @@ then >> CATEGORY="pkey" run_test ./protection_keys_64 >> fi >> >> -if [ -x ./soft-dirty ] >> -then >> - CATEGORY="soft_dirty" run_test ./soft-dirty >> -fi >> +CATEGORY="soft_dirty" run_test ./soft-dirty >> >> CATEGORY="pagemap" run_test ./pagemap_ioctl > > Ah right. since all archs have the soft-dirty, we can remove the if > condition. Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org> With that, thanks! -- Cheers, David
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.