[PATCH v3 0/2] wifi: ath9k: fix the RX filter handling around spectral scans

Nerijus Bendžiūnas posted 2 patches 2 weeks ago
.../net/wireless/ath/ath9k/common-spectral.c  | 13 ++++--
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c           | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.h           |  2 +
3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
[PATCH v3 0/2] wifi: ath9k: fix the RX filter handling around spectral scans
Posted by Nerijus Bendžiūnas 2 weeks ago
Patch 1 is v2
(https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20260904181709.788886-1-nerijus.bendziunas@gmail.com/)
with a shorter comment and message and the Assisted-by tag in the
documented form. Patch 2 is new and needs the helper from patch 1.

Tested on an AR9271 (ath9k_htc) together with the pending spectral
stats fix; ath9k is build-tested.

Nerijus Bendžiūnas (2):
  wifi: ath9k: stop a failed register read from opening the RX filter
  wifi: ath9k: clear the PHY error filter when a spectral scan is
    disabled

 .../net/wireless/ath/ath9k/common-spectral.c  | 13 ++++--
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c           | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.h           |  2 +
 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)


base-commit: c3bace8584ca707e34ba837f65c2e9d566af4c2c
-- 
2.55.0

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] wifi: ath9k: fix the RX filter handling around spectral scans
Posted by Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2 weeks ago
Nerijus Bendžiūnas <nerijus.bendziunas@gmail.com> writes:

> Patch 1 is v2
> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20260904181709.788886-1-nerijus.bendziunas@gmail.com/)
> with a shorter comment and message and the Assisted-by tag in the
> documented form. Patch 2 is new and needs the helper from patch 1.
>
> Tested on an AR9271 (ath9k_htc) together with the pending spectral
> stats fix; ath9k is build-tested.

You're resending new versions of patches faster than anyone has a chance
to look at them, with series boundaries that keep changing and have
weird dependencies between them. Please don't do that. If you're still
working on patches so that they require changes, then you sent them off
too early; this is not a race, don't submit things until you're
confident in them.

I'm dropping all patches from you from patchwork; if you have a series
of dependent patches, please resend as one series, explaining how they
relate to each other and how you tested them, and then *wait for someone
to look at them before resending*.

-Toke