1. Patchew
  2. linux
  3. View series

[PATCHv4] dmaengine: fsl_raid: check fsl_re_chan_probe() return value

Rosen Penev posted 1 patch 2 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
[PATCHv4] dmaengine: fsl_raid: check fsl_re_chan_probe() return value
Posted by Rosen Penev 2 weeks ago 
fsl_re_probe() ignores the return value of fsl_re_chan_probe() and
unconditionally increments total_chans. When a channel fails to probe
(for example, an IRQ mapping failure) its re_jrs[] slot is left NULL, yet
total_chans still advances, so fsl_re_remove_chan() later dereferences the
NULL pointer during device removal.

Check return value and only count successfully probed channels, and guard
fsl_re_remove() against NULL entries.

Fixes: ad80da658bbc ("dmaengine: Driver support for FSL RaidEngine device.")
Assisted-by: opencode:hy3-free
Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
---
 v4: use break;
 v3: fix sashiko review
 v2: fix description
 drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c b/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c
index 9cc289f7129e..6167fa652e96 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c
@@ -836,18 +836,32 @@ static int fsl_re_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
 		}
 		/* Find out the Job Rings present under each JQ */
 		for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
+			if (ridx >= FSL_RE_MAX_CHANS) {
+				dev_warn(dev,
+					"too many job rings, max %d\n",
+					FSL_RE_MAX_CHANS);
+				of_node_put(child);
+				break;
+			}
+
 			rc = of_device_is_compatible(child,
 					     "fsl,raideng-v1.0-job-ring");
+			if (!rc)
+				continue;
+
+			rc = fsl_re_chan_probe(ofdev, child, ridx, off);
 			if (rc) {
-				fsl_re_chan_probe(ofdev, child, ridx++, off);
-				re_priv->total_chans++;
+				dev_err(dev,
+					"job ring %d probe failed: %d\n",
+					ridx, rc);
+				continue;
 			}
+			ridx++;
+			re_priv->total_chans++;
 		}
 	}
 
-	dma_async_device_register(dma_dev);
-
-	return 0;
+	return dma_async_device_register(dma_dev);
 }
 
 static void fsl_re_remove_chan(struct fsl_re_chan *chan)
@@ -872,7 +886,8 @@ static void fsl_re_remove(struct platform_device *ofdev)
 
 	/* Cleanup chan related memory areas */
 	for (i = 0; i < re_priv->total_chans; i++)
-		fsl_re_remove_chan(re_priv->re_jrs[i]);
+		if (re_priv->re_jrs[i])
+			fsl_re_remove_chan(re_priv->re_jrs[i]);
 
 	/* Unregister the driver */
 	dma_async_device_unregister(&re_priv->dma_dev);
-- 
2.55.0
Re: [PATCHv4] dmaengine: fsl_raid: check fsl_re_chan_probe() return value
Posted by Vinod Koul 1 week, 2 days ago 
On 10-09-26, 13:06, Rosen Penev wrote:
> fsl_re_probe() ignores the return value of fsl_re_chan_probe() and
> unconditionally increments total_chans. When a channel fails to probe
> (for example, an IRQ mapping failure) its re_jrs[] slot is left NULL, yet
> total_chans still advances, so fsl_re_remove_chan() later dereferences the
> NULL pointer during device removal.
> 
> Check return value and only count successfully probed channels, and guard
> fsl_re_remove() against NULL entries.
> 
> Fixes: ad80da658bbc ("dmaengine: Driver support for FSL RaidEngine device.")
> Assisted-by: opencode:hy3-free
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
> ---
>  v4: use break;
>  v3: fix sashiko review
>  v2: fix description
>  drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c b/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c
> index 9cc289f7129e..6167fa652e96 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c
> @@ -836,18 +836,32 @@ static int fsl_re_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
>  		}
>  		/* Find out the Job Rings present under each JQ */
>  		for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
> +			if (ridx >= FSL_RE_MAX_CHANS) {
> +				dev_warn(dev,
> +					"too many job rings, max %d\n",
> +					FSL_RE_MAX_CHANS);

what is wrong with:

                                dev_warn(dev, too many job rings, max %d\n", FSL_RE_MAX_CHANS);

exceeds 80chars but makes reading less painful!


> +				of_node_put(child);
> +				break;
> +			}
> +
>  			rc = of_device_is_compatible(child,
>  					     "fsl,raideng-v1.0-job-ring");
> +			if (!rc)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			rc = fsl_re_chan_probe(ofdev, child, ridx, off);
>  			if (rc) {
> -				fsl_re_chan_probe(ofdev, child, ridx++, off);
> -				re_priv->total_chans++;
> +				dev_err(dev,
> +					"job ring %d probe failed: %d\n",
> +					ridx, rc);

here as well

> +				continue;
>  			}
> +			ridx++;
> +			re_priv->total_chans++;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	dma_async_device_register(dma_dev);
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	return dma_async_device_register(dma_dev);
>  }
>  
>  static void fsl_re_remove_chan(struct fsl_re_chan *chan)
> @@ -872,7 +886,8 @@ static void fsl_re_remove(struct platform_device *ofdev)
>  
>  	/* Cleanup chan related memory areas */
>  	for (i = 0; i < re_priv->total_chans; i++)
> -		fsl_re_remove_chan(re_priv->re_jrs[i]);
> +		if (re_priv->re_jrs[i])
> +			fsl_re_remove_chan(re_priv->re_jrs[i]);
>  
>  	/* Unregister the driver */
>  	dma_async_device_unregister(&re_priv->dma_dev);
> -- 
> 2.55.0

-- 
~Vinod
Re: [PATCHv4] dmaengine: fsl_raid: check fsl_re_chan_probe() return value
Posted by Frank Li 1 week, 6 days ago 
On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 01:06:37PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> fsl_re_probe() ignores the return value of fsl_re_chan_probe() and
> unconditionally increments total_chans. When a channel fails to probe
> (for example, an IRQ mapping failure) its re_jrs[] slot is left NULL, yet
> total_chans still advances, so fsl_re_remove_chan() later dereferences the
> NULL pointer during device removal.
>
> Check return value and only count successfully probed channels, and guard
> fsl_re_remove() against NULL entries.
>
> Fixes: ad80da658bbc ("dmaengine: Driver support for FSL RaidEngine device.")
> Assisted-by: opencode:hy3-free
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>

>  v4: use break;
>  v3: fix sashiko review
>  v2: fix description
>  drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c b/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c
> index 9cc289f7129e..6167fa652e96 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c
> @@ -836,18 +836,32 @@ static int fsl_re_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
>  		}
>  		/* Find out the Job Rings present under each JQ */
>  		for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
> +			if (ridx >= FSL_RE_MAX_CHANS) {
> +				dev_warn(dev,
> +					"too many job rings, max %d\n",
> +					FSL_RE_MAX_CHANS);
> +				of_node_put(child);
> +				break;
> +			}
> +
>  			rc = of_device_is_compatible(child,
>  					     "fsl,raideng-v1.0-job-ring");
> +			if (!rc)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			rc = fsl_re_chan_probe(ofdev, child, ridx, off);
>  			if (rc) {
> -				fsl_re_chan_probe(ofdev, child, ridx++, off);
> -				re_priv->total_chans++;
> +				dev_err(dev,
> +					"job ring %d probe failed: %d\n",
> +					ridx, rc);
> +				continue;
>  			}
> +			ridx++;
> +			re_priv->total_chans++;
>  		}
>  	}
>
> -	dma_async_device_register(dma_dev);
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	return dma_async_device_register(dma_dev);
>  }
>
>  static void fsl_re_remove_chan(struct fsl_re_chan *chan)
> @@ -872,7 +886,8 @@ static void fsl_re_remove(struct platform_device *ofdev)
>
>  	/* Cleanup chan related memory areas */
>  	for (i = 0; i < re_priv->total_chans; i++)
> -		fsl_re_remove_chan(re_priv->re_jrs[i]);
> +		if (re_priv->re_jrs[i])
> +			fsl_re_remove_chan(re_priv->re_jrs[i]);
>
>  	/* Unregister the driver */
>  	dma_async_device_unregister(&re_priv->dma_dev);
> --
> 2.55.0
>

Patchew 2.1-devel-ea86937

© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.