Two comment typos under 802.15.4, split per component.  Found with scripts/checkpatch.pl using the
misspelling list in scripts/spelling.txt.  Comments only, no code
changes.

v1 went out with a bare [PATCH] and a "net:" subject prefix.  As
maintainer-netdev.rst asks, v2 designates the patches to a tree, and
each subject now names the component it touches instead of "net:".  The
series is rebased onto that tree; the diff is unchanged.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260907064346.3288-1-hemanth.selam@gmail.com/


Hemanth Selam (2):
  ieee802154: at86rf230: fix typo "upto" in comment
  mac802154: fix typo "substract" in comment

 drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c | 2 +-
 net/mac802154/iface.c              | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

On 07/09/2026 at 15:21:30 +0530, Hemanth Selam <hemanth.selam@gmail.com> wrote:

> Two comment typos under 802.15.4, split per component.  Found with scripts/checkpatch.pl using the
> misspelling list in scripts/spelling.txt.  Comments only, no code
> changes.
>
> v1 went out with a bare [PATCH] and a "net:" subject prefix.  As
> maintainer-netdev.rst asks, v2 designates the patches to a tree, and
> each subject now names the component it touches instead of "net:".  The
> series is rebased onto that tree; the diff is unchanged.

I didn't ask for a split, we can abuse the prefix in that case.

You should not have dropped my R-by tag though, given the fact that the
diff is strictly identical.

Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

No need to resend again though.

Thanks,
Miquèl

On Mon, 07 Sep 2026, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> You should not have dropped my R-by tag though, given the fact that the
> diff is strictly identical.

You are right, and I am sorry.  The diff was unchanged, so your tag should
have been carried over.  I rebuilt the series from the commits rather than
from the posted patches and lost the trailer on the way; that is my
mistake, not something you should have had to chase.

Thanks for re-giving it, and for the note on the split.  I split by
component because maintainer-netdev.rst asks the prefix to name the code
being touched, and I could not see how to name both drivers/net/ieee802154
and net/mac802154 in one prefix.  Abusing the prefix is fine by me next
time.

I will not resend, as you asked.