kernel/workqueue.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Correct "upto" to "up to", reported by scripts/checkpatch.pl using the
misspelling list in scripts/spelling.txt. Only touches comments, no code
changes.
Assisted-by: Cursor:claude-opus-5
Signed-off-by: Hemanth Selam <hemanth.selam@gmail.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 1ae3732a2c51..b6afb7cee661 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -8264,7 +8264,7 @@ static void __init wq_cpu_intensive_thresh_init(void)
* lot slower CPUs including microcontrollers where the threshold is way
* too low.
*
- * Let's scale up the threshold upto 1 second if BogoMips is below 4000.
+ * Let's scale up the threshold up to 1 second if BogoMips is below 4000.
* This is by no means accurate but it doesn't have to be. The mechanism
* is still useful even when the threshold is fully scaled up. Also, as
* the reports would usually be applicable to everyone, some machines
--
2.48.1
Hello, Applied to wq/for-7.4. Thanks. -- tejun
On 7 September 2026 07:23:38 BST, Hemanth Selam <hemanth.selam@gmail.com> wrote: >Correct "upto" to "up to", reported by scripts/checkpatch.pl using the >misspelling list in scripts/spelling.txt. Only touches comments, no code >changes. Ok. > >Assisted-by: Cursor:claude-opus-5 >Signed-off-by: Hemanth Selam <hemanth.selam@gmail.com> >--- > kernel/workqueue.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c >index 1ae3732a2c51..b6afb7cee661 100644 >--- a/kernel/workqueue.c >+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c >@@ -8264,7 +8264,7 @@ static void __init wq_cpu_intensive_thresh_init(void) > * lot slower CPUs including microcontrollers where the threshold is way > * too low. > * >- * Let's scale up the threshold upto 1 second if BogoMips is below 4000. >+ * Let's scale up the threshold up to 1 second if BogoMips is below 4000. Really. Sigh. > * This is by no means accurate but it doesn't have to be. The mechanism > * is still useful even when the threshold is fully scaled up. Also, as > * the reports would usually be applicable to everyone, some machines > --- Thanks! https://lore.kernel.org/all/EE579805-42F2-4C58-B752-F28779EEB717@grrlz.net/
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.