Correct "informations" to "information", reported by scripts/checkpatch.pl
using the misspelling list in scripts/spelling.txt.  Only touches comments,
no code changes.

Assisted-by: Cursor:claude-opus-5
Signed-off-by: Hemanth Selam <hemanth.selam@gmail.com>
---
 fs/jffs2/xattr.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/jffs2/xattr.c b/fs/jffs2/xattr.c
index 6b4f68593c29..c91ade74c5a8 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/xattr.c
@@ -39,8 +39,8 @@
  *   memory usage by cache is over c->xdatum_mem_threshold. Currently, this threshold
  *   is hard coded as 32KiB.
  * do_verify_xattr_datum(c, xd)
- *   is used to load the xdatum informations without name/value pair from the medium.
- *   It's necessary once, because those informations are not collected during mounting
+ *   is used to load the xdatum information without name/value pair from the medium.
+ *   It's necessary once, because those information are not collected during mounting
  *   process when EBS is enabled.
  *   0 will be returned, if success. An negative return value means recoverable error, and
  *   positive return value means unrecoverable error. Thus, caller must remove this xdatum
-- 
2.48.1

Am Fri, Sep 4, 2026, 13:28 schrieb Hemanth Selam <hemanth.selam@gmail.com>:

> Correct "informations" to "information", reported by scripts/checkpatch.pl
> using the misspelling list in scripts/spelling.txt.  Only touches comments,
> no code changes.

Ack.

> Assisted-by: Cursor:claude-opus-5
> Signed-off-by: Hemanth Selam <hemanth.selam@gmail.com>

What really creeps me out is that you're using Cursor/Opus for spell-check patches.
Please think about the environment.  Neither electricity nor water is free.

Thanks,
//richard

Thanks for the ack, and the criticism is fair.

To answer it plainly rather than defend it: the typos were found by
checkpatch and codespell, which need no model at all.  What I used the
assistant for was the mechanical work around that - grouping several
hundred one-line changes per subsystem, working out who to send each one
to, and writing the changelogs.  That is not a good trade for the energy
it costs, and running the two scanners directly would have produced the
same patches.

The Assisted-by: tag is there because Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst
asks for it, and I would rather over-disclose than hide it.  But your point
stands, and I am not going to keep feeding a model work that grep can do.