Drop the second 'if', reported by checkpatch.pl as a possible repeated
word.  Only touches a comment, no code changes.

Assisted-by: Cursor:claude-opus-5
Signed-off-by: Hemanth Selam <hemanth.selam@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c b/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c
index b8ec2e6f615f..c08d60e3c85f 100644
--- a/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c
+++ b/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static int s10_ops_write(struct fpga_manager *mgr, const char *buf,
 
 	/*
 	 * Loop waiting for buffers to be returned.  When a buffer is returned,
-	 * reuse it to send more data or free if if all data has been sent.
+	 * reuse it to send more data or free if all data has been sent.
 	 */
 	while (count > 0 || s10_free_buffer_count(mgr) != NUM_SVC_BUFS) {
 		reinit_completion(&priv->status_return_completion);
-- 
2.48.1

On Fri, Sep 04, 2026 at 04:51:52PM +0530, Hemanth Selam wrote:
> Drop the second 'if', reported by checkpatch.pl as a possible repeated
> word.  Only touches a comment, no code changes.
> 
> Assisted-by: Cursor:claude-opus-5
> Signed-off-by: Hemanth Selam <hemanth.selam@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c b/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c
> index b8ec2e6f615f..c08d60e3c85f 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c
> @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static int s10_ops_write(struct fpga_manager *mgr, const char *buf,
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Loop waiting for buffers to be returned.  When a buffer is returned,
> -	 * reuse it to send more data or free if if all data has been sent.
> +	 * reuse it to send more data or free if all data has been sent.

The actual fix should probably be "free it if ...“, right?

>  	 */
>  	while (count > 0 || s10_free_buffer_count(mgr) != NUM_SVC_BUFS) {
>  		reinit_completion(&priv->status_return_completion);
> -- 
> 2.48.1
> 
>