Documentation/driver-api/pwm.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Remove needless '(' from sentence.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Ebner <manuelebnerli@mailbox.org>
---
Documentation/driver-api/pwm.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/pwm.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/pwm.rst
index 0d27a40f5..d62e3a695 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-api/pwm.rst
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/pwm.rst
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ and pwm_put() may not be called from an atomic context.
Most functions in the PWM consumer API might sleep and so must not be called
from atomic context. The notable exception is pwm_apply_atomic() which has the
same semantics as pwm_apply_might_sleep() but can be called from atomic context.
-(The price for that is that it doesn't work for all PWM devices, use
+The price for that is that it doesn't work for all PWM devices, use
pwm_might_sleep() to check if a given PWM supports atomic operation.
Locking in the PWM core ensures that callbacks related to a single chip are
--
2.54.0
On 9/3/26 9:05 AM, Manuel Ebner wrote:
> Remove needless '(' from sentence.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manuel Ebner <manuelebnerli@mailbox.org>
> ---
> Documentation/driver-api/pwm.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/pwm.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/pwm.rst
> index 0d27a40f5..d62e3a695 100644
> --- a/Documentation/driver-api/pwm.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/pwm.rst
> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ and pwm_put() may not be called from an atomic context.
> Most functions in the PWM consumer API might sleep and so must not be called
> from atomic context. The notable exception is pwm_apply_atomic() which has the
> same semantics as pwm_apply_might_sleep() but can be called from atomic context.
> -(The price for that is that it doesn't work for all PWM devices, use
> +The price for that is that it doesn't work for all PWM devices, use
> pwm_might_sleep() to check if a given PWM supports atomic operation.
OK. Could you also fix the comma splice on that same line?
Thanks.
>
> Locking in the PWM core ensures that callbacks related to a single chip are
--
~Randy
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.