[PATCH RESEND] drm/sched: Create faux device for KUnit tests

oushixiong1025@163.com posted 1 patch 3 weeks, 1 day ago
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/mock_scheduler.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/sched_tests.h    |  2 ++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
[PATCH RESEND] drm/sched: Create faux device for KUnit tests
Posted by oushixiong1025@163.com 3 weeks, 1 day ago
From: Shixiong Ou <oushixiong@kylinos.cn>

The DRM scheduler KUnit tests currently pass NULL for the dev field in
drm_sched_init_args, which causes a NULL pointer dereference in the
drm_sched_job trace event when it calls dev_name() on sched->dev.

Use faux_device_create() to create a fake device for the mock scheduler,
so the scheduler always has a valid device pointer. This avoids the
trace event crash without requiring the production code to accept a NULL
device pointer, which conceptually makes no sense for a scheduler.

An atomic counter is used to generate unique device names, since
multiple mock schedulers can exist simultaneously across different
test suites.

Signed-off-by: Shixiong Ou <oushixiong@kylinos.cn>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/mock_scheduler.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/sched_tests.h    |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/mock_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/mock_scheduler.c
index 14403a762335..cd87e405bb1e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/mock_scheduler.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/mock_scheduler.c
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 /* Copyright (c) 2025 Valve Corporation */
 
+#include <linux/device/faux.h>
+
 #include "sched_tests.h"
 
 /*
@@ -10,6 +12,8 @@
  * Test cases are implemented in a separate file.
  */
 
+static atomic_t drm_mock_sched_instance = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
+
 /**
  * drm_mock_sched_entity_new - Create a new mock scheduler entity
  *
@@ -296,11 +300,20 @@ struct drm_mock_scheduler *drm_mock_sched_new(struct kunit *test, long timeout)
 		.name		= "drm-mock-scheduler",
 	};
 	struct drm_mock_scheduler *sched;
+	char name[64];
 	int ret;
 
 	sched = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*sched), GFP_KERNEL);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sched);
 
+	snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "drm-mock-scheduler-%d",
+		 atomic_inc_return(&drm_mock_sched_instance));
+
+	sched->faux_dev = faux_device_create(name, NULL, NULL);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sched->faux_dev);
+
+	args.dev = &sched->faux_dev->dev;
+
 	ret = drm_sched_init(&sched->base, &args);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
 
@@ -323,6 +336,7 @@ struct drm_mock_scheduler *drm_mock_sched_new(struct kunit *test, long timeout)
 void drm_mock_sched_fini(struct drm_mock_scheduler *sched)
 {
 	drm_sched_fini(&sched->base);
+	faux_device_destroy(sched->faux_dev);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/sched_tests.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/sched_tests.h
index 553d45abd057..bbf4da585866 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/sched_tests.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/sched_tests.h
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 #include <kunit/test.h>
 #include <linux/atomic.h>
 #include <linux/completion.h>
+#include <linux/device/faux.h>
 #include <linux/dma-fence.h>
 #include <linux/hrtimer.h>
 #include <linux/ktime.h>
@@ -44,6 +45,7 @@ struct drm_mock_scheduler {
 	struct drm_gpu_scheduler base;
 
 	struct kunit		*test;
+	struct faux_device	*faux_dev;
 
 	spinlock_t		lock;
 	struct list_head	job_list;
-- 
2.25.1


No virus found
		Checked by Hillstone Network AntiVirus
Re: [PATCH RESEND] drm/sched: Create faux device for KUnit tests
Posted by Maxime Ripard 3 weeks, 1 day ago
Hi,

On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 05:02:56PM +0800, oushixiong1025@163.com wrote:
> From: Shixiong Ou <oushixiong@kylinos.cn>
> 
> The DRM scheduler KUnit tests currently pass NULL for the dev field in
> drm_sched_init_args, which causes a NULL pointer dereference in the
> drm_sched_job trace event when it calls dev_name() on sched->dev.
> 
> Use faux_device_create() to create a fake device for the mock scheduler,
> so the scheduler always has a valid device pointer. This avoids the
> trace event crash without requiring the production code to accept a NULL
> device pointer, which conceptually makes no sense for a scheduler.
> 
> An atomic counter is used to generate unique device names, since
> multiple mock schedulers can exist simultaneously across different
> test suites.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shixiong Ou <oushixiong@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/mock_scheduler.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/sched_tests.h    |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/mock_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/mock_scheduler.c
> index 14403a762335..cd87e405bb1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/mock_scheduler.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/mock_scheduler.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>  /* Copyright (c) 2025 Valve Corporation */
>  
> +#include <linux/device/faux.h>
> +
>  #include "sched_tests.h"
>  
>  /*
> @@ -10,6 +12,8 @@
>   * Test cases are implemented in a separate file.
>   */
>  
> +static atomic_t drm_mock_sched_instance = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> +
>  /**
>   * drm_mock_sched_entity_new - Create a new mock scheduler entity
>   *
> @@ -296,11 +300,20 @@ struct drm_mock_scheduler *drm_mock_sched_new(struct kunit *test, long timeout)
>  		.name		= "drm-mock-scheduler",
>  	};
>  	struct drm_mock_scheduler *sched;
> +	char name[64];
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	sched = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*sched), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sched);
>  
> +	snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "drm-mock-scheduler-%d",
> +		 atomic_inc_return(&drm_mock_sched_instance));
> +
> +	sched->faux_dev = faux_device_create(name, NULL, NULL);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sched->faux_dev);
> +
> +	args.dev = &sched->faux_dev->dev;
> +
>  	ret = drm_sched_init(&sched->base, &args);
>  	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>  
> @@ -323,6 +336,7 @@ struct drm_mock_scheduler *drm_mock_sched_new(struct kunit *test, long timeout)
>  void drm_mock_sched_fini(struct drm_mock_scheduler *sched)
>  {
>  	drm_sched_fini(&sched->base);
> +	faux_device_destroy(sched->faux_dev);
>  }

What's wrong with drm_kunit_helper_alloc_device(), or kunit_device_register()?

Maxime
Re: [PATCH RESEND] drm/sched: Create faux device for KUnit tests
Posted by Danilo Krummrich 3 weeks, 1 day ago
On Thu Sep 3, 2026 at 11:36 AM CEST, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> What's wrong with drm_kunit_helper_alloc_device(), or kunit_device_register()?

That's probably may bad, in a previous patch that tried to support a NULL device
in the scheduler instead I mistakenly mentioned faux while making the point that
we should use some mock device instead.

Thanks,
Danilo
Re: [PATCH RESEND] drm/sched: Create faux device for KUnit tests
Posted by Philipp Stanner 3 weeks, 1 day ago
On Thu, 2026-09-03 at 17:02 +0800, oushixiong1025@163.com wrote:
> From: Shixiong Ou <oushixiong@kylinos.cn>
> 
> The DRM scheduler KUnit tests currently pass NULL for the dev field in
> drm_sched_init_args, which causes a NULL pointer dereference in the
> drm_sched_job trace event when it calls dev_name() on sched->dev.
> 
> Use faux_device_create() to create a fake device for the mock scheduler,
> so the scheduler always has a valid device pointer. This avoids the
> trace event crash without requiring the production code to accept a NULL
> device pointer, which conceptually makes no sense for a scheduler.
> 
> An atomic counter is used to generate unique device names, since
> multiple mock schedulers can exist simultaneously across different
> test suites.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shixiong Ou <oushixiong@kylinos.cn>

Didn't you address a fault / bug with that?

Cc: stable …
Fixes:

?

> ---
> 

[…]

>  
> +static atomic_t drm_mock_sched_instance = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> +
>  /**
>   * drm_mock_sched_entity_new - Create a new mock scheduler entity
>   *
> @@ -296,11 +300,20 @@ struct drm_mock_scheduler *drm_mock_sched_new(struct kunit *test, long timeout)
>  		.name		= "drm-mock-scheduler",
>  	};
>  	struct drm_mock_scheduler *sched;
> +	char name[64];
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	sched = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*sched), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sched);
>  
> +	snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "drm-mock-scheduler-%d",

You could use args.name here.

> +		 atomic_inc_return(&drm_mock_sched_instance));

Couldn't that atomic be a `static unsigned int` inside this function?
Is simpler and limits the scope. And I wouldn't expect that we'll ever
call drm_mock_sched_new() multi-threaded, or would we?


Besides looks cool, thx

P.