[PATCH RESEND] usb: gadget: f_loopback: fix descriptor leak on unbind

Chaithanya Lagisetty posted 1 patch 3 weeks, 2 days ago
There is a newer version of this series
drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_loopback.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH RESEND] usb: gadget: f_loopback: fix descriptor leak on unbind
Posted by Chaithanya Lagisetty 3 weeks, 2 days ago
loopback_bind() allocates descriptor copies through
usb_assign_descriptors(), but f_loopback does not release them during
the unbind path. On every bind/unbind cycle of the gadget (for example
by repeatedly writing the UDC attribute through configfs) a new set of
descriptors is allocated while the previous ones are leaked. syzbot
reported this via kmemleak:

  BUG: memory leak
  unreferenced object 0xffff888016b8f180 (size 64):
    comm "repro", pid 5613
    backtrace:
      __kmalloc_noprof+0x3bf/0x550
      usb_copy_descriptors+0x6c/0x160
      usb_assign_descriptors+0x48/0x180
      loopback_bind+0xff/0x120
      usb_add_function+0xca/0x270
      configfs_composite_bind+0x667/0x9b0
      gadget_bind_driver+0xed/0x390

Move descriptor cleanup to a new loopback_unbind() callback that frees
them with usb_free_all_descriptors(), matching the lifecycle used by
other gadget functions such as f_acm. With descriptors released during
unbind, the usb_free_all_descriptors() call in lb_free_func() becomes
redundant and can be removed.

Fixes: 10287baec761 ("usb: gadget: always update HS/SS descriptors and create a copy of them")
Reported-by: syzbot+28cf08dec5895bd562e6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=28cf08dec5895bd562e6
Signed-off-by: Chaithanya Lagisetty <nagachaithanya9911@gmail.com>
---
Resend after the merge window. Unmodified from the original posting, and
still applies cleanly to current mainline (45c13f3f9e3b).

Original posting:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260808181504.462492-1-nagachaithanya9911@gmail.com/

 drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_loopback.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_loopback.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_loopback.c
index d2d07fb49e70..40aaf2eb00f2 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_loopback.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_loopback.c
@@ -216,6 +216,11 @@ static int loopback_bind(struct usb_configuration *c, struct usb_function *f)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void loopback_unbind(struct usb_configuration *c, struct usb_function *f)
+{
+	usb_free_all_descriptors(f);
+}
+
 static void lb_free_func(struct usb_function *f)
 {
 	struct f_lb_opts *opts;
@@ -226,7 +231,6 @@ static void lb_free_func(struct usb_function *f)
 	opts->refcnt--;
 	mutex_unlock(&opts->lock);
 
-	usb_free_all_descriptors(f);
 	kfree(func_to_loop(f));
 }
 
@@ -442,6 +446,7 @@ static struct usb_function *loopback_alloc(struct usb_function_instance *fi)
 
 	loop->function.name = "loopback";
 	loop->function.bind = loopback_bind;
+	loop->function.unbind = loopback_unbind;
 	loop->function.set_alt = loopback_set_alt;
 	loop->function.disable = loopback_disable;
 	loop->function.strings = loopback_strings;
-- 
2.43.0
Re: [PATCH RESEND] usb: gadget: f_loopback: fix descriptor leak on unbind
Posted by Greg KH 2 weeks, 1 day ago
On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 10:51:53AM +0000, Chaithanya Lagisetty wrote:
> loopback_bind() allocates descriptor copies through
> usb_assign_descriptors(), but f_loopback does not release them during
> the unbind path. On every bind/unbind cycle of the gadget (for example
> by repeatedly writing the UDC attribute through configfs) a new set of
> descriptors is allocated while the previous ones are leaked. syzbot
> reported this via kmemleak:
> 
>   BUG: memory leak
>   unreferenced object 0xffff888016b8f180 (size 64):
>     comm "repro", pid 5613
>     backtrace:
>       __kmalloc_noprof+0x3bf/0x550
>       usb_copy_descriptors+0x6c/0x160
>       usb_assign_descriptors+0x48/0x180
>       loopback_bind+0xff/0x120
>       usb_add_function+0xca/0x270
>       configfs_composite_bind+0x667/0x9b0
>       gadget_bind_driver+0xed/0x390
> 
> Move descriptor cleanup to a new loopback_unbind() callback that frees
> them with usb_free_all_descriptors(), matching the lifecycle used by
> other gadget functions such as f_acm. With descriptors released during
> unbind, the usb_free_all_descriptors() call in lb_free_func() becomes
> redundant and can be removed.
> 
> Fixes: 10287baec761 ("usb: gadget: always update HS/SS descriptors and create a copy of them")
> Reported-by: syzbot+28cf08dec5895bd562e6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=28cf08dec5895bd562e6

How was this tested?  I don't see syzbot doing the test, did you?

And did you forget an Assisted-by: tag?

thanks,

greg k-h
Re: [PATCH RESEND] usb: gadget: f_loopback: fix descriptor leak on unbind
Posted by Chaithanya Lagisetty 2 weeks, 1 day ago
On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 06:32:50PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> How was this tested?  I don't see syzbot doing the test, did you?

I ran the syzbot reproducer from the reported bug against both an
unpatched and a patched kernel.

Both kernels were built from the same source tree and .config, with the
same compiler and QEMU environment; the patch was the only difference.

On the unpatched kernel, the reproducer triggered 3 "BUG: memory leak"
reports in 5 iterations.  All reported allocations originated from
loopback_bind() through usb_assign_descriptors() / usb_copy_descriptors():

  BUG: memory leak
  unreferenced object 0xffff888016dad4c0 (size 64):
    comm "repro", pid 5597, jiffies 4294942168
    backtrace (crc c8d54481):
      __kmalloc_noprof+0x391/0x540
      usb_copy_descriptors+0x6c/0x170
      usb_assign_descriptors+0x6c/0x180
      loopback_bind+0xf4/0x130
      usb_add_function+0xca/0x270
      configfs_composite_bind+0x6dc/0xa90
      gadget_bind_driver+0xf7/0x3e0
      ...
      gadget_dev_desc_UDC_store+0x153/0x1e0

On the patched kernel, I ran 25 reproducer iterations and observed no
"BUG: memory leak" reports.  I also performed three explicit kmemleak
scans, all of which were clean.

> And did you forget an Assisted-by: tag?

Yes, I did.  I will add:

  Assisted-by: Cursor:opus-5

in the next revision.

Regards,
Chaithanya