tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
I've realized that it didn't set up the tracing files when BPF is used
so poll() just returns immediately. It ends up with calling poll()
unnecessarily in a loop.
BPF still needs the loop to wait for the target process exiting or a
signal from users. Let's use a semaphore instead.
Suggested-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
index 4f881a40c311ae52..6017493ff179758b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
@@ -6,23 +6,23 @@
* Copyright (c) 2020 Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>, significant enhancement.
*/
-#include "builtin.h"
-
+#include <ctype.h>
#include <errno.h>
-#include <unistd.h>
-#include <signal.h>
-#include <stdlib.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <math.h>
#include <poll.h>
-#include <ctype.h>
+#include <semaphore.h>
+#include <signal.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/capability.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/zalloc.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
+#include "builtin.h"
#include "debug.h"
#include <subcmd/pager.h>
#include <subcmd/parse-options.h>
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
static volatile sig_atomic_t workload_exec_errno;
static volatile sig_atomic_t done;
+static sem_t sig_sem;
static struct stats latency_stats; /* for tracepoints */
@@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ static char tracing_instance[PATH_MAX]; /* Trace instance directory */
static void sig_handler(int sig __maybe_unused)
{
done = true;
+ sem_post(&sig_sem);
}
/*
@@ -68,6 +70,7 @@ static void ftrace__workload_exec_failed_signal(int signo __maybe_unused,
{
workload_exec_errno = info->si_value.sival_int;
done = true;
+ sem_post(&sig_sem);
}
static bool check_ftrace_capable(void)
@@ -1146,6 +1149,11 @@ static int __cmd_latency(struct perf_ftrace *ftrace)
line[0] = '\0';
while (!done) {
+ if (ftrace->target.use_bpf) {
+ sem_wait(&sig_sem);
+ break;
+ }
+
if (poll(&pollfd, 1, -1) < 0)
break;
@@ -1852,6 +1860,8 @@ int cmd_ftrace(int argc, const char **argv)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ftrace.nograph_funcs);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ftrace.event_pair);
+ sem_init(&sig_sem, 0, 0);
+
signal(SIGINT, sig_handler);
signal(SIGUSR1, sig_handler);
signal(SIGCHLD, sig_handler);
@@ -2015,5 +2025,11 @@ int cmd_ftrace(int argc, const char **argv)
delete_filter_func(&ftrace.nograph_funcs);
delete_filter_func(&ftrace.event_pair);
+ signal(SIGINT, SIG_DFL);
+ signal(SIGUSR1, SIG_DFL);
+ signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_DFL);
+ signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_DFL);
+
+ sem_destroy(&sig_sem);
return ret;
}
--
2.55.0.897.gb25b4bd76c-goog
On Sun, Aug 30, 2026 at 11:39 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> I've realized that it didn't set up the tracing files when BPF is used
> so poll() just returns immediately. It ends up with calling poll()
> unnecessarily in a loop.
>
> BPF still needs the loop to wait for the target process exiting or a
> signal from users. Let's use a semaphore instead.
>
> Suggested-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Thanks,
Ian
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> index 4f881a40c311ae52..6017493ff179758b 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> @@ -6,23 +6,23 @@
> * Copyright (c) 2020 Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>, significant enhancement.
> */
>
> -#include "builtin.h"
> -
> +#include <ctype.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> -#include <unistd.h>
> -#include <signal.h>
> -#include <stdlib.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #include <inttypes.h>
> #include <math.h>
> #include <poll.h>
> -#include <ctype.h>
> +#include <semaphore.h>
> +#include <signal.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> #include <linux/capability.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/string.h>
> #include <linux/zalloc.h>
> #include <sys/stat.h>
>
> +#include "builtin.h"
> #include "debug.h"
> #include <subcmd/pager.h>
> #include <subcmd/parse-options.h>
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
>
> static volatile sig_atomic_t workload_exec_errno;
> static volatile sig_atomic_t done;
> +static sem_t sig_sem;
>
> static struct stats latency_stats; /* for tracepoints */
>
> @@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ static char tracing_instance[PATH_MAX]; /* Trace instance directory */
> static void sig_handler(int sig __maybe_unused)
> {
> done = true;
> + sem_post(&sig_sem);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -68,6 +70,7 @@ static void ftrace__workload_exec_failed_signal(int signo __maybe_unused,
> {
> workload_exec_errno = info->si_value.sival_int;
> done = true;
> + sem_post(&sig_sem);
> }
>
> static bool check_ftrace_capable(void)
> @@ -1146,6 +1149,11 @@ static int __cmd_latency(struct perf_ftrace *ftrace)
>
> line[0] = '\0';
> while (!done) {
> + if (ftrace->target.use_bpf) {
> + sem_wait(&sig_sem);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> if (poll(&pollfd, 1, -1) < 0)
> break;
>
> @@ -1852,6 +1860,8 @@ int cmd_ftrace(int argc, const char **argv)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ftrace.nograph_funcs);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ftrace.event_pair);
>
> + sem_init(&sig_sem, 0, 0);
> +
> signal(SIGINT, sig_handler);
> signal(SIGUSR1, sig_handler);
> signal(SIGCHLD, sig_handler);
> @@ -2015,5 +2025,11 @@ int cmd_ftrace(int argc, const char **argv)
> delete_filter_func(&ftrace.nograph_funcs);
> delete_filter_func(&ftrace.event_pair);
>
> + signal(SIGINT, SIG_DFL);
> + signal(SIGUSR1, SIG_DFL);
> + signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_DFL);
> + signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_DFL);
> +
> + sem_destroy(&sig_sem);
> return ret;
> }
> --
> 2.55.0.897.gb25b4bd76c-goog
>
On Fri, Sep 04, 2026 at 10:36:08AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > On Sun, Aug 30, 2026 at 11:39 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > I've realized that it didn't set up the tracing files when BPF is used > > so poll() just returns immediately. It ends up with calling poll() > > unnecessarily in a loop. > > > > BPF still needs the loop to wait for the target process exiting or a > > signal from users. Let's use a semaphore instead. > > > > Suggested-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> > > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> > > Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> > > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> > > Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next, for v7.4. - Arnaldo
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.