mm/memcontrol.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Sashiko [1] reported that memcg_hotplug_cpu_dead() drains the stocks
of the CPU which went away but leaves FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE alone.
The flag can be set at that point: drain_all_stock() may have claimed
the stock and queued the drain work shortly before the CPU went down.
workqueue_offline_cpu() unbinds the per-cpu workers, so such a pending
work item is executed by an unbound worker on some other CPU, where
drain_local_memcg_stock() operates on this_cpu_ptr() and thus drains
and clears the flag of that other CPU instead. Nothing clears the flag
of the dead CPU, so drain_all_stock() would skip its stock forever once
the CPU comes back online.
Clear the flag of both stocks after draining them.
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260828135036.7d44361f%40fangorn [1]
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index e082aa68fa5c..872115c6b0f2 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2378,9 +2378,21 @@ void drain_all_stock(struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg)
static int memcg_hotplug_cpu_dead(unsigned int cpu)
{
+ struct memcg_stock_pcp *memcg_st = &per_cpu(memcg_stock, cpu);
+ struct obj_stock_pcp *obj_st = &per_cpu(obj_stock, cpu);
+
/* no need for the local lock */
- drain_obj_stock(&per_cpu(obj_stock, cpu));
- drain_stock_fully(&per_cpu(memcg_stock, cpu));
+ drain_obj_stock(obj_st);
+ drain_stock_fully(memcg_st);
+
+ /*
+ * A drain work queued before the CPU went away is executed by an
+ * unbound worker on some other CPU and clears that CPU's flag, so
+ * clear the flags here to make these stocks drainable again once
+ * the CPU comes back online.
+ */
+ clear_bit(FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE, &memcg_st->flags);
+ clear_bit(FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE, &obj_st->flags);
return 0;
}
--
2.53.0-Meta
On Fri 28-08-26 12:24:19, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> Sashiko [1] reported that memcg_hotplug_cpu_dead() drains the stocks
> of the CPU which went away but leaves FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE alone.
>
> The flag can be set at that point: drain_all_stock() may have claimed
> the stock and queued the drain work shortly before the CPU went down.
> workqueue_offline_cpu() unbinds the per-cpu workers, so such a pending
> work item is executed by an unbound worker on some other CPU, where
> drain_local_memcg_stock() operates on this_cpu_ptr() and thus drains
> and clears the flag of that other CPU instead. Nothing clears the flag
> of the dead CPU, so drain_all_stock() would skip its stock forever once
> the CPU comes back online.
>
> Clear the flag of both stocks after draining them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260828135036.7d44361f%40fangorn [1]
I suspect this goes all the way down to
Fixes: 26fe61684449 ("memcg: fix percpu cached charge draining frequency")
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Btw. is there any good reason why we are not clearing the bit directly
in drain_obj_stock resp. drain_stock_fully. Doing so would simplify the
code flow and prevent from bugs like this one.
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index e082aa68fa5c..872115c6b0f2 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2378,9 +2378,21 @@ void drain_all_stock(struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg)
>
> static int memcg_hotplug_cpu_dead(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> + struct memcg_stock_pcp *memcg_st = &per_cpu(memcg_stock, cpu);
> + struct obj_stock_pcp *obj_st = &per_cpu(obj_stock, cpu);
> +
> /* no need for the local lock */
> - drain_obj_stock(&per_cpu(obj_stock, cpu));
> - drain_stock_fully(&per_cpu(memcg_stock, cpu));
> + drain_obj_stock(obj_st);
> + drain_stock_fully(memcg_st);
> +
> + /*
> + * A drain work queued before the CPU went away is executed by an
> + * unbound worker on some other CPU and clears that CPU's flag, so
> + * clear the flags here to make these stocks drainable again once
> + * the CPU comes back online.
> + */
> + clear_bit(FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE, &memcg_st->flags);
> + clear_bit(FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE, &obj_st->flags);
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.53.0-Meta
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
On Fri, 2026-08-28 at 12:24 -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote: > Sashiko [1] reported that memcg_hotplug_cpu_dead() drains the stocks > of the CPU which went away but leaves FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE alone. > > The flag can be set at that point: drain_all_stock() may have claimed > the stock and queued the drain work shortly before the CPU went down. > workqueue_offline_cpu() unbinds the per-cpu workers, so such a > pending > work item is executed by an unbound worker on some other CPU, where > drain_local_memcg_stock() operates on this_cpu_ptr() and thus drains > and clears the flag of that other CPU instead. Nothing clears the > flag > of the dead CPU, so drain_all_stock() would skip its stock forever > once > the CPU comes back online. > > Clear the flag of both stocks after draining them. > > Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> > Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org> > Link: > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260828135036.7d44361f%40fangorn [1] > --- > Funny, my AI came up with the same solution, and I just asked it to do a safety analysis on it. It was quite thorough. Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> -- All Rights Reversed.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.