Fix following sparse warnings by using __force attribute:

sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
   drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:571:20: sparse: sparse:
cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression
   drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:749:17: sparse: sparse:
cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression
   drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:773:24: sparse: sparse:
cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression
   drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:797:25: sparse: sparse:
cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression

>> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:837:49: sparse: sparse:
incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) @@     expected
void *rsc_offset @@     got void [noderef] __iomem * @@
   drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:837:49: sparse:
expected void *rsc_offset
   drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:837:49: sparse:     got
void [noderef] __iomem *

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202608190009.uCbYi1Y5-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
index c685bb5fa62c..f9cdd3c024dc 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
@@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ static int tcm_mem_map(struct rproc *rproc,
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	/* Update memory entry va */
-	mem->va = (void *)va;
+	mem->va = (__force void *)va;
 
 	/* clear TCMs */
 	memset_io(va, 0, mem->len);
@@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ static struct resource_table *zynqmp_r5_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc
 
 	*size = r5_core->rsc_tbl_size;
 
-	return (struct resource_table *)r5_core->rsc_tbl_va;
+	return (__force struct resource_table *)r5_core->rsc_tbl_va;
 }
 
 static int zynqmp_r5_get_rsc_table_va(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core)
@@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_get_rsc_table_va(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	rsc_data_va = (struct rsc_tbl_data *)ioremap_wc(res_mem.start,
+	rsc_data_va = (__force struct rsc_tbl_data *)ioremap_wc(res_mem.start,
 							sizeof(struct rsc_tbl_data));
 	if (!rsc_data_va) {
 		dev_err(dev, "failed to map resource table data address\n");
@@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_get_rsc_table_va(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	rsc_tbl_addr = (struct resource_table *)r5_core->rsc_tbl_va;
+	rsc_tbl_addr = (__force struct resource_table *)r5_core->rsc_tbl_va;
 
 	/*
 	 * As of now resource table version 1 is expected. Don't fail to attach
@@ -834,7 +834,7 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_handle_rsc(struct rproc *rproc, u32 rsc_type, void *rsc,
 				int offset, int avail)
 {
 	struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
-	void *rsc_offset = (r5_core->rsc_tbl_va + offset);
+	void *rsc_offset = (__force void *)(r5_core->rsc_tbl_va + offset);
 
 	if (rsc_type != XLNX_RPROC_FW_CRASH_REPORT)
 		return RSC_IGNORED;

base-commit: d4d61a4b0a52e8f3cdb3e1578602850a3452ec3e
-- 
2.43.0