.../prog_tests/test_struct_ops_trampoline.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++ .../bpf/progs/struct_ops_trampoline.c | 24 +++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c | 18 ++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h | 5 +++ 4 files changed, 88 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_trampoline.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_trampoline.c
Add a test case to verify that arguments passed on the stack are correctly
read by indirect struct_ops trampoline. This test ensures the correctness
of stack offsets on architectures like LoongArch and RISC-V.
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
---
This is to test the following two patches:
bpf, riscv: Fix stack-passed arguments for indirect trampolines
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260821233516.3426127-3-memxor@gmail.com/
bpf, loongarch: Fix stack arguments for indirect trampolines
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260821233516.3426127-8-memxor@gmail.com/
.../prog_tests/test_struct_ops_trampoline.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++
.../bpf/progs/struct_ops_trampoline.c | 24 +++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c | 18 ++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h | 5 +++
4 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_trampoline.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_trampoline.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_trampoline.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_trampoline.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5a21aedd02fc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_trampoline.c
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "struct_ops_trampoline.skel.h"
+
+#if defined(__loongarch__) || defined(__riscv)
+static void run_struct_ops_trampoline(void)
+{
+ struct struct_ops_trampoline *skel;
+ struct bpf_link *link;
+ int err;
+
+ skel = struct_ops_trampoline__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "struct_ops_trampoline__open"))
+ return;
+
+ err = struct_ops_trampoline__load(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "struct_ops_trampoline__load"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.testmod_trampoline);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(256), "trigger_read");
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->got_arg9, 9999, "check_stack_passed_arg9");
+
+ bpf_link__destroy(link);
+cleanup:
+ struct_ops_trampoline__destroy(skel);
+}
+#endif
+
+void test_struct_ops_trampoline(void)
+{
+#if defined(__loongarch__) || defined(__riscv)
+ run_struct_ops_trampoline();
+#else
+ test__skip();
+#endif
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_trampoline.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_trampoline.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b0fc19a2a0c5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_trampoline.c
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include "../test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h"
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+__u64 got_arg9 = 0;
+
+SEC("struct_ops/test_trampoline")
+int BPF_PROG(test_trampoline, int arg1, int arg2, int arg3,
+ int arg4, int arg5, int arg6,
+ int arg7, int arg8, int arg9)
+{
+ got_arg9 = arg9;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC(".struct_ops.link")
+struct bpf_testmod_ops testmod_trampoline = {
+ .test_trampoline = (void *)test_trampoline,
+};
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
index 850cf4f830c4..be96bbc1b7c0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -589,6 +589,9 @@ noinline int bpf_testmod_trampoline_count_test(void)
return 0;
}
+struct bpf_testmod_ops;
+static struct bpf_testmod_ops *st_ops_trampoline;
+
noinline ssize_t
bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
const struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
@@ -637,6 +640,9 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
bpf_testmod_test_struct_ops3();
+ if (st_ops_trampoline && st_ops_trampoline->test_trampoline)
+ st_ops_trampoline->test_trampoline(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9999);
+
struct_arg3 = kmalloc((sizeof(struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3) +
sizeof(int)), GFP_KERNEL);
if (struct_arg3 != NULL) {
@@ -1619,6 +1625,10 @@ static int bpf_testmod_ops_init_member(const struct btf_type *t,
((struct bpf_testmod_ops *)kdata)->data = ((struct bpf_testmod_ops *)udata)->data;
return 1;
}
+
+ if (member->offset == offsetof(struct bpf_testmod_ops, test_trampoline) * 8)
+ st_ops_trampoline = (struct bpf_testmod_ops *)kdata;
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1694,6 +1704,13 @@ bpf_testmod_ops__test_return_ref_kptr(int dummy, struct task_struct *task__ref,
return NULL;
}
+static int bpf_testmod_ops__test_trampoline(int arg1, int arg2, int arg3,
+ int arg4, int arg5, int arg6,
+ int arg7, int arg8, int arg9)
+{
+ return arg9;
+}
+
static struct bpf_testmod_ops __bpf_testmod_ops = {
.test_1 = bpf_testmod_test_1,
.test_2 = bpf_testmod_test_2,
@@ -1701,6 +1718,7 @@ static struct bpf_testmod_ops __bpf_testmod_ops = {
.test_refcounted = bpf_testmod_ops__test_refcounted,
.test_refcounted_multi = bpf_testmod_ops__test_refcounted_multi,
.test_return_ref_kptr = bpf_testmod_ops__test_return_ref_kptr,
+ .test_trampoline = bpf_testmod_ops__test_trampoline,
};
struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_bpf_testmod_ops = {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h
index 210b919290cc..a5349d09ce55 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h
@@ -46,6 +46,11 @@ struct bpf_testmod_ops {
struct task_struct *(*test_return_ref_kptr)(int dummy, struct task_struct *task,
struct cgroup *cgrp);
+ /* Used to test indirect struct_ops trampolines stack-passed arguments (>8 args). */
+ int (*test_trampoline)(int arg1, int arg2, int arg3,
+ int arg4, int arg5, int arg6,
+ int arg7, int arg8, int arg9);
+
/* The following fields are used to test shadow copies. */
char onebyte;
struct {
--
2.42.0
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_trampoline.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_trampoline.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000000..5a21aedd02fc5 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_trampoline.c > @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +#include <test_progs.h> > +#include "struct_ops_trampoline.skel.h" A subsystem pattern flags this as potentially concerning: the new standalone prog_tests file plus a new progs file are added to cover a 9-argument struct_ops callback whose last argument is stack-passed. tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_arena.c already exercises this shape via bpf_testmod_ops3.test_arena_stack, whose declaration in bpf_testmod.h carries the comment "enough leading args to force @ptr onto the stack on x86 and arm64", and test_arena_stack_cb() already pins the slot layout with argument checks before using ctx[8]. That test is driven from prog_tests/test_struct_ops_arena.c in the same directory. The plausible reason for a separate file is that the arena test is gated to __x86_64__ || __aarch64__ and needs arena support, which LoongArch and RISC-V lack. Could a plain (non-arena) >8-argument member on bpf_testmod_ops3 plus a new case in test_struct_ops_arena.c or test_struct_ops_multi_args.c have avoided a new test binary? [ ... ] > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_trampoline.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_trampoline.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000000..b0fc19a2a0c53 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_trampoline.c > @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +#include <vmlinux.h> > +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h> > +#include "../test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h" > +#include "bpf_misc.h" This isn't a bug, but could the bpf_misc.h include be dropped? The program has no __failure/__success/__msg/__retval/__sink/__arch_* annotation, unlike progs/struct_ops_multi_args.c which includes the same header and does use __failure __msg(...). [ ... ] > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c > index 850cf4f830c48..be96bbc1b7c04 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c > @@ -589,6 +589,9 @@ noinline int bpf_testmod_trampoline_count_test(void) > return 0; > } > > +struct bpf_testmod_ops; > +static struct bpf_testmod_ops *st_ops_trampoline; This isn't a bug, but does the struct bpf_testmod_ops forward declaration add anything here? bpf_testmod.c already includes "bpf_testmod.h" at the top, which defines the struct completely, and the dereference below at st_ops_trampoline->test_trampoline requires the complete type. The neighbouring static struct bpf_testmod_ops3 *st_ops3 carries no such forward declaration. [ ... ] --- AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug. See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/33142391368
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.