drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
During sas_resume_ha() -> sas_drain_work(), ATA EH will trigger SMP IOs via
sas_phy_reset() -> sas_smp_phy_control() for expander-attached ATA devices.
Since ha->dev is RPM_RESUMING at that point, pm_runtime_get_sync() blocks
waiting for the resume to finish, but the resume is blocked in
sas_drain_work() waiting for the SMP IO — a deadlock.
Skip the PM get/put when SAS_HA_RESUMING is set. The hardware is already
initialized by the LLDD resume callback before sas_resume_ha() runs, so no
explicit resume is needed.
Only hisi_sas enables runtime PM among libsas LLDDs, so other drivers
(pm8001, isci, aic94xx, mvsas) are unaffected.
Fixes: 0da7ca4c4fd9 ("scsi: libsas: Resume host while sending SMP I/Os")
Signed-off-by: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@huawei.com>
---
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
index 811c9eb4fef1..77ae2ae7b2c4 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
@@ -61,8 +61,17 @@ static int smp_execute_task_sg(struct domain_device *dev,
struct sas_internal *i =
to_sas_internal(dev->port->ha->shost->transportt);
struct sas_ha_struct *ha = dev->port->ha;
-
- pm_runtime_get_sync(ha->dev);
+ bool skip_pm = test_bit(SAS_HA_RESUMING, &ha->state);
+
+ /*
+ * Skip PM get/put during HA resume to avoid deadlock: the host is
+ * RPM_RESUMING and the drain waits for this SMP IO to finish, but
+ * pm_runtime_get_sync() would block on RPM_RESUMING. Safe because
+ * hardware is already initialized by the LLDD before call
+ * sas_resume_ha().
+ */
+ if (!skip_pm)
+ pm_runtime_get_sync(ha->dev);
mutex_lock(&dev->ex_dev.cmd_mutex);
for (retry = 0; retry < 3; retry++) {
if (test_bit(SAS_DEV_GONE, &dev->state)) {
@@ -135,7 +144,8 @@ static int smp_execute_task_sg(struct domain_device *dev,
}
}
mutex_unlock(&dev->ex_dev.cmd_mutex);
- pm_runtime_put_sync(ha->dev);
+ if (!skip_pm)
+ pm_runtime_put_sync(ha->dev);
BUG_ON(retry == 3 && task != NULL);
sas_free_task(task);
--
2.43.0
Hi John & Jason,
Kindly ping for review...
On 2026/8/26 11:28, Xingui Yang wrote:
> During sas_resume_ha() -> sas_drain_work(), ATA EH will trigger SMP IOs via
> sas_phy_reset() -> sas_smp_phy_control() for expander-attached ATA devices.
> Since ha->dev is RPM_RESUMING at that point, pm_runtime_get_sync() blocks
> waiting for the resume to finish, but the resume is blocked in
> sas_drain_work() waiting for the SMP IO — a deadlock.
>
> Skip the PM get/put when SAS_HA_RESUMING is set. The hardware is already
> initialized by the LLDD resume callback before sas_resume_ha() runs, so no
> explicit resume is needed.
>
> Only hisi_sas enables runtime PM among libsas LLDDs, so other drivers
> (pm8001, isci, aic94xx, mvsas) are unaffected.
>
> Fixes: 0da7ca4c4fd9 ("scsi: libsas: Resume host while sending SMP I/Os")
> Signed-off-by: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
> index 811c9eb4fef1..77ae2ae7b2c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
> @@ -61,8 +61,17 @@ static int smp_execute_task_sg(struct domain_device *dev,
> struct sas_internal *i =
> to_sas_internal(dev->port->ha->shost->transportt);
> struct sas_ha_struct *ha = dev->port->ha;
> -
> - pm_runtime_get_sync(ha->dev);
> + bool skip_pm = test_bit(SAS_HA_RESUMING, &ha->state);
> +
> + /*
> + * Skip PM get/put during HA resume to avoid deadlock: the host is
> + * RPM_RESUMING and the drain waits for this SMP IO to finish, but
> + * pm_runtime_get_sync() would block on RPM_RESUMING. Safe because
> + * hardware is already initialized by the LLDD before call
> + * sas_resume_ha().
> + */
> + if (!skip_pm)
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(ha->dev);
> mutex_lock(&dev->ex_dev.cmd_mutex);
> for (retry = 0; retry < 3; retry++) {
> if (test_bit(SAS_DEV_GONE, &dev->state)) {
> @@ -135,7 +144,8 @@ static int smp_execute_task_sg(struct domain_device *dev,
> }
> }
> mutex_unlock(&dev->ex_dev.cmd_mutex);
> - pm_runtime_put_sync(ha->dev);
> + if (!skip_pm)
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(ha->dev);
>
> BUG_ON(retry == 3 && task != NULL);
> sas_free_task(task);
>
On 9/11/26 02:00, yangxingui wrote:
> Hi John & Jason,
>
> Kindly ping for review...
What about the sashiko comment:
- [High] Bypassing PM reference counting via a global state flag creates
a race condition where concurrent independent threads can submit SMP
I/Os without holding a PM reference, risking premature hardware suspend.
It looks correct.
>
> On 2026/8/26 11:28, Xingui Yang wrote:
>> During sas_resume_ha() -> sas_drain_work(),
This is poorly described - what does during sas_resume_ha() ->
sas_drain_work() even mean?
> ATA EH will trigger SMP
>> IOs via
>> sas_phy_reset() -> sas_smp_phy_control() for expander-attached ATA
>> devices.
What commands are these specifically?
>> Since ha->dev is RPM_RESUMING at that point, pm_runtime_get_sync() blocks
>> waiting for the resume to finish, but the resume is blocked in
>> sas_drain_work() waiting for the SMP IO — a deadlock.
>>
>> Skip the PM get/put when SAS_HA_RESUMING is set. The hardware is already
>> initialized by the LLDD resume callback before sas_resume_ha() runs,
>> so no
>> explicit resume is needed.
>>
>> Only hisi_sas enables runtime PM among libsas LLDDs, so other drivers
>> (pm8001, isci, aic94xx, mvsas) are unaffected.
>>
>> Fixes: 0da7ca4c4fd9 ("scsi: libsas: Resume host while sending SMP I/Os")
>> Signed-off-by: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/
>> sas_expander.c
>> index 811c9eb4fef1..77ae2ae7b2c4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
>> @@ -61,8 +61,17 @@ static int smp_execute_task_sg(struct domain_device
>> *dev,
>> struct sas_internal *i =
>> to_sas_internal(dev->port->ha->shost->transportt);
>> struct sas_ha_struct *ha = dev->port->ha;
>> -
>> - pm_runtime_get_sync(ha->dev);
>> + bool skip_pm = test_bit(SAS_HA_RESUMING, &ha->state);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Skip PM get/put during HA resume to avoid deadlock: the host is
>> + * RPM_RESUMING and the drain waits for this SMP IO to finish, but
>> + * pm_runtime_get_sync() would block on RPM_RESUMING. Safe because
>> + * hardware is already initialized by the LLDD before call
>> + * sas_resume_ha().
>> + */
>> + if (!skip_pm)
>> + pm_runtime_get_sync(ha->dev);
>> mutex_lock(&dev->ex_dev.cmd_mutex);
>> for (retry = 0; retry < 3; retry++) {
>> if (test_bit(SAS_DEV_GONE, &dev->state)) {
>> @@ -135,7 +144,8 @@ static int smp_execute_task_sg(struct
>> domain_device *dev,
>> }
>> }
>> mutex_unlock(&dev->ex_dev.cmd_mutex);
>> - pm_runtime_put_sync(ha->dev);
>> + if (!skip_pm)
>> + pm_runtime_put_sync(ha->dev);
>> BUG_ON(retry == 3 && task != NULL);
>> sas_free_task(task);
>>
Hi John
Thank you for the review.
On 2026/9/16 21:58, John Garry wrote:
> On 9/11/26 02:00, yangxingui wrote:
>> Hi John & Jason,
>>
>> Kindly ping for review...
>
> What about the sashiko comment:
>
> - [High] Bypassing PM reference counting via a global state flag creates
> a race condition where concurrent independent threads can submit SMP
> I/Os without holding a PM reference, risking premature hardware suspend.
>
> It looks correct.
Agreed. Although the possibility is very slim.
The SMP IO which sas_drain_work() waits on cannot outlive the
SAS_HA_RESUMING window, but a BSG request submitted during the window
takes no PM reference for the duration of its IO, and the controller
may autosuspend underneath it. v2 takes the reference with
pm_runtime_get_noresume()/pm_runtime_put_noidle() instead: the usage
counter stays elevated for the IO duration, without waiting for the
already ongoing resume.
>
>>
>> On 2026/8/26 11:28, Xingui Yang wrote:
>>> During sas_resume_ha() -> sas_drain_work(),
>
> This is poorly described - what does during sas_resume_ha() ->
> sas_drain_work() even mean?
The deadlock happens during a runtime resume, while
sas_resume_ha() is inside sas_drain_work(), flushing the event and
discovery workqueues. That flush includes the DISCE_RESUME work queued
when the phys come back up: sas_resume_devices() -> sas_resume_sata()
resumes the ATA ports through the libata error handler and waits for
it in sas_ata_flush_pm_eh(). So the resume is blocked in
sas_drain_work() waiting on that error handling - and the error
handling's reset of the expander-attached ATA device blocks on the
host being RPM_RESUMING, i.e. on the very resume which is waiting on
it.
>
>> ATA EH will trigger SMP
>>> IOs via
>>> sas_phy_reset() -> sas_smp_phy_control() for expander-attached ATA
>>> devices.
>
> What commands are these specifically?
SMP PHY CONTROL (hard reset or link reset) commands, sent to the
expander which owns the phy of the ATA device being recovered:
ata_eh_recover() -> ata_eh_reset() -> sas_ata_hard_reset()
-> lldd_I_T_nexus_reset() -> sas_phy_reset()
-> sas_smp_phy_control() -> smp_execute_task_sg()
A directly-attached device would take the lldd_control_phy() path
instead, which is why only the EXP topology deadlocks.
Thanks,
Xingui
.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.