[PATCH] memory: pl353: Convert to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS()

Triet Hoang posted 1 patch 1 month, 1 week ago
drivers/memory/pl353-smc.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
[PATCH] memory: pl353: Convert to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS()
Posted by Triet Hoang 1 month, 1 week ago
Convert the deprecated SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS
to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS
and pm_sleep_ptr().

This lets us drop the __maybe_unused annotations
from its suspend and resume callbacks,
also reduces kernel size in case CONFIG_PM or
CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is disabled.

Signed-off-by: Triet Hoang <triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/memory/pl353-smc.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/memory/pl353-smc.c b/drivers/memory/pl353-smc.c
index 28a8cc56003c..047e42c8715a 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/pl353-smc.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/pl353-smc.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ struct pl353_smc_data {
 	struct clk		*aclk;
 };
 
-static int __maybe_unused pl353_smc_suspend(struct device *dev)
+static int pl353_smc_suspend(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct pl353_smc_data *pl353_smc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused pl353_smc_suspend(struct device *dev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int __maybe_unused pl353_smc_resume(struct device *dev)
+static int pl353_smc_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct pl353_smc_data *pl353_smc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	int ret;
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused pl353_smc_resume(struct device *dev)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(pl353_smc_dev_pm_ops, pl353_smc_suspend,
+static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(pl353_smc_dev_pm_ops, pl353_smc_suspend,
 			 pl353_smc_resume);
 
 static const struct of_device_id pl353_smc_supported_children[] = {
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(amba, pl353_ids);
 static struct amba_driver pl353_smc_driver = {
 	.drv = {
 		.name = "pl353-smc",
-		.pm = &pl353_smc_dev_pm_ops,
+		.pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&pl353_smc_dev_pm_ops),
 	},
 	.id_table = pl353_ids,
 	.probe = pl353_smc_probe,
-- 
2.53.0
Re: [PATCH] memory: pl353: Convert to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS()
Posted by Miquel Raynal 1 month ago
Hi Triet,

On 21/08/2026 at 14:44:17 +07, Triet Hoang <triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com> wrote:

> Convert the deprecated SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS
> to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS
> and pm_sleep_ptr().
>
> This lets us drop the __maybe_unused annotations
> from its suspend and resume callbacks,
> also reduces kernel size in case CONFIG_PM or
> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is disabled.

Here is the occasion for sending a v2 with your two patches: wrapping at
50 chars is abusive :)

Other than that, I guess the diff is fine.

Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Re: [PATCH] memory: pl353: Convert to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS()
Posted by Triet Hoang 1 month ago
On Tue, 25 Aug 2026 10:13:17 +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:

> Here is the occasion for sending a v2 with your two patches: wrapping at
> 50 chars is abusive :)
> 
> Other than that, I guess the diff is fine.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Thanks for your review. I will correct this and send the v2.

Regards,
Triet
Re: [PATCH] memory: pl353: Convert to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS()
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 1 month, 1 week ago
On 21/08/2026 09:44, Triet Hoang wrote:
> Convert the deprecated SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS
> to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS
> and pm_sleep_ptr().
> 
> This lets us drop the __maybe_unused annotations
> from its suspend and resume callbacks,
> also reduces kernel size in case CONFIG_PM or
> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is disabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Triet Hoang <triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com>
> ---

So I should respond to every email?

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH] memory: atmel-ebi: Convert to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS()
Posted by Triet Hoang 1 month, 1 week ago
On Fri, 21 Aug 2026 09:45:50 +0200
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:

> So I should respond to every email?

Hi Krzysztof,

I am sorry for the inconvenience. 
I understand that I should have organized the patches 
into subsystem-based patchsets instead of sending them separately.

Currently, I only have these two patches for the memory controller subsystem. 
Could you please review them? I will make sure to organize my patches 
properly in the future.

Thank you for your patience and guidance.

Regards,
Triet