Clean up loop bound calculation by replacing sizeof(bds_factors) /
sizeof(struct bayer_ds_factor) with the ARRAY_SIZE() helper macro
to improve readability and maintainability.

v2: Move loop increment to the same line as the for statement as requested.

Signed-off-by: Rishab Madhugiri <rishab.madhugiri@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_compat_css20.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_compat_css20.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_compat_css20.c
index 0ee52637e..e8734ca1a 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_compat_css20.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_compat_css20.c
@@ -2160,8 +2160,7 @@ static void __configure_video_pp_input(struct atomisp_sub_device *asd,
 	bayer_ds_out_res->width = effective_res->width;
 	bayer_ds_out_res->height = effective_res->height;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < sizeof(bds_factors) / sizeof(struct bayer_ds_factor);
-	     i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bds_factors); i++) {
 		if (effective_res->width >= out_width *
 		    bds_factors[i].numerator / bds_factors[i].denominator &&
 		    effective_res->height >= out_height *
-- 
2.43.0

On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 07:55:29AM +0000, Rishab Madhugiri wrote:
> Clean up loop bound calculation by replacing sizeof(bds_factors) /
> sizeof(struct bayer_ds_factor) with the ARRAY_SIZE() helper macro
> to improve readability and maintainability.

> v2: Move loop increment to the same line as the for statement as requested.

This should go...

> Signed-off-by: Rishab Madhugiri <rishab.madhugiri@gmail.com>
> ---

...under here, so it won't be included into Git history.

...

> -	for (i = 0; i < sizeof(bds_factors) / sizeof(struct bayer_ds_factor);
> -	     i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bds_factors); i++) {

While at it, also consider

	for (unsigned int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bds_factors); i++) {

and dropping the above definition since i is not used outside of the loop.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 07:55:29AM +0000, Rishab Madhugiri wrote:
> Clean up loop bound calculation by replacing sizeof(bds_factors) /
> sizeof(struct bayer_ds_factor) with the ARRAY_SIZE() helper macro
> to improve readability and maintainability.
> 
> v2: Move loop increment to the same line as the for statement as requested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rishab Madhugiri <rishab.madhugiri@gmail.com>
> ---

Thanks, but the v2 has to go below, also best to wait a day between
resends.

https://staticthinking.wordpress.com/2022/07/27/how-to-send-a-v2-patch/

regards,
dan carpenter