[PATCH v2] block/mq-deadline: Drop unused dd parameters

Hongfu Li posted 1 patch 1 month, 2 weeks ago
block/mq-deadline.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
[PATCH v2] block/mq-deadline: Drop unused dd parameters
Posted by Hongfu Li 1 month, 2 weeks ago
From: Hongfu Li <lihongfu@kylinos.cn>

Commit c807ab520fc3 ("block/mq-deadline: Add I/O priority support")
left the dd parameter unused in deadline_move_request().

Commit fde02699c242 ("block: mq-deadline: Remove support for zone
write locking") left dd unused in deadline_fifo_request() and
deadline_next_request().

Remove these unused function parameters.

Signed-off-by: Hongfu Li <lihongfu@kylinos.cn>
---
v2:
- Adjust code formatting.
- No functional changes.
---
 block/mq-deadline.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/mq-deadline.c b/block/mq-deadline.c
index 824bfc17b2c6..5f643c0ce2a8 100644
--- a/block/mq-deadline.c
+++ b/block/mq-deadline.c
@@ -233,9 +233,8 @@ static void dd_merged_requests(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req,
 /*
  * move an entry to dispatch queue
  */
-static void
-deadline_move_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
-		      struct request *rq)
+static void deadline_move_request(struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
+				  struct request *rq)
 {
 	/*
 	 * take it off the sort and fifo list
@@ -269,9 +268,8 @@ static inline bool deadline_check_fifo(struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
  * For the specified data direction, return the next request to
  * dispatch using arrival ordered lists.
  */
-static struct request *
-deadline_fifo_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
-		      enum dd_data_dir data_dir)
+static struct request *deadline_fifo_request(struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
+					     enum dd_data_dir data_dir)
 {
 	if (list_empty(&per_prio->fifo_list[data_dir]))
 		return NULL;
@@ -283,9 +281,8 @@ deadline_fifo_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
  * For the specified data direction, return the next request to
  * dispatch using sector position sorted lists.
  */
-static struct request *
-deadline_next_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
-		      enum dd_data_dir data_dir)
+static struct request *deadline_next_request(struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
+					     enum dd_data_dir data_dir)
 {
 	return deadline_from_pos(per_prio, data_dir,
 				 per_prio->latest_pos[data_dir]);
@@ -334,7 +331,7 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd,
 	/*
 	 * batches are currently reads XOR writes
 	 */
-	rq = deadline_next_request(dd, per_prio, dd->last_dir);
+	rq = deadline_next_request(per_prio, dd->last_dir);
 	if (rq && dd->batching < dd->fifo_batch) {
 		/* we have a next request and are still entitled to batch */
 		data_dir = rq_data_dir(rq);
@@ -349,7 +346,7 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd,
 	if (!list_empty(&per_prio->fifo_list[DD_READ])) {
 		BUG_ON(RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&per_prio->sort_list[DD_READ]));
 
-		if (deadline_fifo_request(dd, per_prio, DD_WRITE) &&
+		if (deadline_fifo_request(per_prio, DD_WRITE) &&
 		    (dd->starved++ >= dd->writes_starved))
 			goto dispatch_writes;
 
@@ -379,14 +376,14 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd,
 	/*
 	 * we are not running a batch, find best request for selected data_dir
 	 */
-	next_rq = deadline_next_request(dd, per_prio, data_dir);
+	next_rq = deadline_next_request(per_prio, data_dir);
 	if (deadline_check_fifo(per_prio, data_dir) || !next_rq) {
 		/*
 		 * A deadline has expired, the last request was in the other
 		 * direction, or we have run out of higher-sectored requests.
 		 * Start again from the request with the earliest expiry time.
 		 */
-		rq = deadline_fifo_request(dd, per_prio, data_dir);
+		rq = deadline_fifo_request(per_prio, data_dir);
 	} else {
 		/*
 		 * The last req was the same dir and we have a next request in
@@ -409,7 +406,7 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd,
 	 * rq is the selected appropriate request.
 	 */
 	dd->batching++;
-	deadline_move_request(dd, per_prio, rq);
+	deadline_move_request(per_prio, rq);
 	return dd_start_request(dd, data_dir, rq);
 }
 
-- 
2.54.0
Re: [PATCH v2] block/mq-deadline: Drop unused dd parameters
Posted by Jens Axboe 1 month, 2 weeks ago
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:07:29 +0800, Hongfu Li wrote:
> Commit c807ab520fc3 ("block/mq-deadline: Add I/O priority support")
> left the dd parameter unused in deadline_move_request().
> 
> Commit fde02699c242 ("block: mq-deadline: Remove support for zone
> write locking") left dd unused in deadline_fifo_request() and
> deadline_next_request().
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] block/mq-deadline: Drop unused dd parameters
      commit: 7fab47863aa2a1680415bd73b7e0a4212a2ebf0e

Best regards,
-- 
Jens Axboe
Re: [PATCH v2] block/mq-deadline: Drop unused dd parameters
Posted by Tao Cui 1 month, 2 weeks ago

于 2026年8月12日 GMT+08:00 12:07:29,Hongfu Li <hongfu.li@linux.dev> 写道:
>From: Hongfu Li <lihongfu@kylinos.cn>
>
>Commit c807ab520fc3 ("block/mq-deadline: Add I/O priority support")
>left the dd parameter unused in deadline_move_request().
>
>Commit fde02699c242 ("block: mq-deadline: Remove support for zone
>write locking") left dd unused in deadline_fifo_request() and
>deadline_next_request().
>
>Remove these unused function parameters.
>
>Signed-off-by: Hongfu Li <lihongfu@kylinos.cn>
>---
>v2:
>- Adjust code formatting.
>- No functional changes.
>---
> block/mq-deadline.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/block/mq-deadline.c b/block/mq-deadline.c
>index 824bfc17b2c6..5f643c0ce2a8 100644
>--- a/block/mq-deadline.c
>+++ b/block/mq-deadline.c
>@@ -233,9 +233,8 @@ static void dd_merged_requests(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req,
> /*
>  * move an entry to dispatch queue
>  */
>-static void
>-deadline_move_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
>-		      struct request *rq)
>+static void deadline_move_request(struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
>+				  struct request *rq)
> {
> 	/*
> 	 * take it off the sort and fifo list
>@@ -269,9 +268,8 @@ static inline bool deadline_check_fifo(struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
>  * For the specified data direction, return the next request to
>  * dispatch using arrival ordered lists.
>  */
>-static struct request *
>-deadline_fifo_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
>-		      enum dd_data_dir data_dir)
>+static struct request *deadline_fifo_request(struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
>+					     enum dd_data_dir data_dir)
> {
> 	if (list_empty(&per_prio->fifo_list[data_dir]))
> 		return NULL;
>@@ -283,9 +281,8 @@ deadline_fifo_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
>  * For the specified data direction, return the next request to
>  * dispatch using sector position sorted lists.
>  */
>-static struct request *
>-deadline_next_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
>-		      enum dd_data_dir data_dir)
>+static struct request *deadline_next_request(struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
>+					     enum dd_data_dir data_dir)
> {
> 	return deadline_from_pos(per_prio, data_dir,
> 				 per_prio->latest_pos[data_dir]);
>@@ -334,7 +331,7 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd,
> 	/*
> 	 * batches are currently reads XOR writes
> 	 */
>-	rq = deadline_next_request(dd, per_prio, dd->last_dir);
>+	rq = deadline_next_request(per_prio, dd->last_dir);
> 	if (rq && dd->batching < dd->fifo_batch) {
> 		/* we have a next request and are still entitled to batch */
> 		data_dir = rq_data_dir(rq);
>@@ -349,7 +346,7 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd,
> 	if (!list_empty(&per_prio->fifo_list[DD_READ])) {
> 		BUG_ON(RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&per_prio->sort_list[DD_READ]));
> 
>-		if (deadline_fifo_request(dd, per_prio, DD_WRITE) &&
>+		if (deadline_fifo_request(per_prio, DD_WRITE) &&
> 		    (dd->starved++ >= dd->writes_starved))
> 			goto dispatch_writes;
> 
>@@ -379,14 +376,14 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd,
> 	/*
> 	 * we are not running a batch, find best request for selected data_dir
> 	 */
>-	next_rq = deadline_next_request(dd, per_prio, data_dir);
>+	next_rq = deadline_next_request(per_prio, data_dir);
> 	if (deadline_check_fifo(per_prio, data_dir) || !next_rq) {
> 		/*
> 		 * A deadline has expired, the last request was in the other
> 		 * direction, or we have run out of higher-sectored requests.
> 		 * Start again from the request with the earliest expiry time.
> 		 */
>-		rq = deadline_fifo_request(dd, per_prio, data_dir);
>+		rq = deadline_fifo_request(per_prio, data_dir);
> 	} else {
> 		/*
> 		 * The last req was the same dir and we have a next request in
>@@ -409,7 +406,7 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd,
> 	 * rq is the selected appropriate request.
> 	 */
> 	dd->batching++;
>-	deadline_move_request(dd, per_prio, rq);
>+	deadline_move_request(per_prio, rq);
> 	return dd_start_request(dd, data_dir, rq);
> }
> 

Reviewed-by: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
Re: [PATCH v2] block/mq-deadline: Drop unused dd parameters
Posted by Bart Van Assche 1 month, 2 weeks ago
On 8/11/26 9:07 PM, Hongfu Li wrote:
> Commit c807ab520fc3 ("block/mq-deadline: Add I/O priority support")
> left the dd parameter unused in deadline_move_request().
> 
> Commit fde02699c242 ("block: mq-deadline: Remove support for zone
> write locking") left dd unused in deadline_fifo_request() and
> deadline_next_request().
> 
> Remove these unused function parameters.

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Re: [PATCH v2] block/mq-deadline: Drop unused dd parameters
Posted by Christoph Hellwig 1 month, 2 weeks ago
Looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>