mm/mlock.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
From: Wandun Chen <chenwandun@lixiang.com>
MLOCK_ONFAULT only locks pages on future faults, so there is no need to
fault in non-present pages during the mlock2/mlockall syscall.
populate_vma_page_range() already returns immediately for VMAs with
VM_LOCKONFAULT, which means __mm_populate() just loops over VMAs and
holds mmap_read_lock without doing useful work.
Skip __mm_populate() when MLOCK_ONFAULT is set to avoid this unnecessary
work.
Signed-off-by: Wandun Chen <chenwandun@lixiang.com>
---
mm/mlock.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
index efa6716e4dfb..784bd4bfc3bb 100644
--- a/mm/mlock.c
+++ b/mm/mlock.c
@@ -658,9 +658,11 @@ static __must_check int do_mlock(unsigned long start, size_t len,
if (error)
return error;
- error = __mm_populate(start, len, 0);
- if (error)
- return __mlock_posix_error_return(error);
+ if (!vma_flags_test(flags, VMA_LOCKONFAULT_BIT)) {
+ error = __mm_populate(start, len, 0);
+ if (error)
+ return __mlock_posix_error_return(error);
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -778,7 +780,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(mlockall, int, flags)
capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK))
ret = apply_mlockall_flags(flags);
mmap_write_unlock(current->mm);
- if (!ret && (flags & MCL_CURRENT))
+ if (!ret && (flags & MCL_CURRENT) && !(flags & MCL_ONFAULT))
mm_populate(0, TASK_SIZE);
return ret;
--
2.43.0
On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 08:51:33PM +0800, Wandun Chen wrote:
> From: Wandun Chen <chenwandun@lixiang.com>
>
> MLOCK_ONFAULT only locks pages on future faults, so there is no need to
> fault in non-present pages during the mlock2/mlockall syscall.
> populate_vma_page_range() already returns immediately for VMAs with
> VM_LOCKONFAULT, which means __mm_populate() just loops over VMAs and
> holds mmap_read_lock without doing useful work.
>
> Skip __mm_populate() when MLOCK_ONFAULT is set to avoid this unnecessary
> work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wandun Chen <chenwandun@lixiang.com>
Well you take mmap read lock and release it (after having held the write lock),
hardly earth-shattering.
And this has been this way for donkey's years I don't really see why we should
care?
Do you have a workload that's heavily dependent on mlock2(..., MLOCK_ONFAULT) or
mlockall(..., MCL_ONFAULT) as a hot path that is seriously contending the mmap
lock?
I don't love how the VMA_LOCKONFAULT_BIT flag works but I'm not sure adding more
churn and code for the sake of it here is really worth it.
Thanks, Lorenzo
> ---
> mm/mlock.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
> index efa6716e4dfb..784bd4bfc3bb 100644
> --- a/mm/mlock.c
> +++ b/mm/mlock.c
> @@ -658,9 +658,11 @@ static __must_check int do_mlock(unsigned long start, size_t len,
> if (error)
> return error;
>
> - error = __mm_populate(start, len, 0);
> - if (error)
> - return __mlock_posix_error_return(error);
> + if (!vma_flags_test(flags, VMA_LOCKONFAULT_BIT)) {
> + error = __mm_populate(start, len, 0);
> + if (error)
> + return __mlock_posix_error_return(error);
> + }
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -778,7 +780,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(mlockall, int, flags)
> capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK))
> ret = apply_mlockall_flags(flags);
> mmap_write_unlock(current->mm);
> - if (!ret && (flags & MCL_CURRENT))
> + if (!ret && (flags & MCL_CURRENT) && !(flags & MCL_ONFAULT))
> mm_populate(0, TASK_SIZE);
>
> return ret;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
On 7/22/26 14:59, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 08:51:33PM +0800, Wandun Chen wrote:
>> From: Wandun Chen <chenwandun@lixiang.com>
>>
>> MLOCK_ONFAULT only locks pages on future faults, so there is no need to
>> fault in non-present pages during the mlock2/mlockall syscall.
>> populate_vma_page_range() already returns immediately for VMAs with
>> VM_LOCKONFAULT, which means __mm_populate() just loops over VMAs and
>> holds mmap_read_lock without doing useful work.
>>
>> Skip __mm_populate() when MLOCK_ONFAULT is set to avoid this unnecessary
>> work.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wandun Chen <chenwandun@lixiang.com>
>
> Well you take mmap read lock and release it (after having held the write lock),
> hardly earth-shattering.
>
> And this has been this way for donkey's years I don't really see why we should
> care?
>
> Do you have a workload that's heavily dependent on mlock2(..., MLOCK_ONFAULT) or
> mlockall(..., MCL_ONFAULT) as a hot path that is seriously contending the mmap
> lock?
>
> I don't love how the VMA_LOCKONFAULT_BIT flag works but I'm not sure adding more
> churn and code for the sake of it here is really worth it.
>
> Thanks, Lorenzo
While that's true, I don't see a problem taking the patch. Otherwise we'll
have to keep rejecting all future attempts (including LLM) doing the same
because it just seems like a low hanging fruit to stop doing an unnecessary
thing.
And it's not that much of a churn or new code, IMHO.
>> ---
>> mm/mlock.c | 10 ++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
>> index efa6716e4dfb..784bd4bfc3bb 100644
>> --- a/mm/mlock.c
>> +++ b/mm/mlock.c
>> @@ -658,9 +658,11 @@ static __must_check int do_mlock(unsigned long start, size_t len,
>> if (error)
>> return error;
>>
>> - error = __mm_populate(start, len, 0);
>> - if (error)
>> - return __mlock_posix_error_return(error);
>> + if (!vma_flags_test(flags, VMA_LOCKONFAULT_BIT)) {
>> + error = __mm_populate(start, len, 0);
>> + if (error)
>> + return __mlock_posix_error_return(error);
>> + }
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -778,7 +780,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(mlockall, int, flags)
>> capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK))
>> ret = apply_mlockall_flags(flags);
>> mmap_write_unlock(current->mm);
>> - if (!ret && (flags & MCL_CURRENT))
>> + if (!ret && (flags & MCL_CURRENT) && !(flags & MCL_ONFAULT))
>> mm_populate(0, TASK_SIZE);
>>
>> return ret;
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.