[PATCH] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sm8550-pas: Add power-domains constraints for Glymur and Kaanapali

Krzysztof Kozlowski posted 1 patch 3 days, 16 hours ago
.../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml       | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
[PATCH] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sm8550-pas: Add power-domains constraints for Glymur and Kaanapali
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 3 days, 16 hours ago
Add missing constraints in "if:then:" block for power-domains on ADSP
and CDSP of Glymur and Kaanapali Qualcomm SoCs (rest of flexible blocks
were constrained already).

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml       | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
index 2a4c527552e6..b6bd37e4b8c5 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
@@ -232,6 +232,8 @@ allOf:
         compatible:
           contains:
             enum:
+              - qcom,glymur-adsp-pas
+              - qcom,kaanapali-adsp-pas
               - qcom,sm8550-adsp-pas
               - qcom,sm8650-adsp-pas
               - qcom,x1e80100-adsp-pas
@@ -269,6 +271,8 @@ allOf:
         compatible:
           contains:
             enum:
+              - qcom,glymur-cdsp-pas
+              - qcom,kaanapali-cdsp-pas
               - qcom,sm8550-cdsp-pas
               - qcom,sm8650-cdsp-pas
               - qcom,x1e80100-cdsp-pas
-- 
2.53.0
Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sm8550-pas: Add power-domains constraints for Glymur and Kaanapali
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 3 days, 15 hours ago
On 21/07/2026 10:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Add missing constraints in "if:then:" block for power-domains on ADSP
> and CDSP of Glymur and Kaanapali Qualcomm SoCs (rest of flexible blocks
> were constrained already).


As Sashiko points, I missed a piece and this is a redundant change,
please ignore.

Best regards,
Krzysztof