On 12/07/2026 05:09, Deep Shah wrote:
> ptp_clock_adjtime() validates an ADJ_FREQUENCY request by converting
> tx->freq to ppb and comparing it against ops->max_adj. On 64-bit systems
> that conversion can overflow s64 and wrap the result back into range, so
> a crafted tx->freq bypasses the check and reaches ->adjfine() unclamped.
>
> Patch 1 rejects the overflow in ptp_clock_adjtime().
> Patch 2 adds a regression test that crafts struct timex.freq directly
> (testptp's int-ppb path cannot express the value) and confirms it is
> rejected with -ERANGE.
>
> Deep Shah (2):
> ptp: reject frequency adjustments that overflow scaled_ppm_to_ppb()
> selftests: ptp: add a regression test for the frequency adjustment
> overflow
>
> drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c | 14 +++-
> tools/testing/selftests/ptp/Makefile | 2 +-
> .../testing/selftests/ptp/ptp_freq_overflow.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ptp/ptp_freq_overflow.c
>
>
> base-commit: 3f1f755366687d051174739fb99f7d560202f60b
For the series:
Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>