Documentation/ABI/obsolete/sysfs-bus-usb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
The sysfs power/level interface is still implemented and documented
despite the removal notice stating it would be removed after 2010.
Remove the outdated removal timeline while keeping the deprecation
notice and recommendation to use power/control instead.
Signed-off-by: Sardaruddin Syed <ssardaruddin2002@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/ABI/obsolete/sysfs-bus-usb | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/obsolete/sysfs-bus-usb b/Documentation/ABI/obsolete/sysfs-bus-usb
index bd096d33fbc7..067016e62e11 100644
--- a/Documentation/ABI/obsolete/sysfs-bus-usb
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/obsolete/sysfs-bus-usb
@@ -26,6 +26,6 @@ Description:
initializes all non-hub devices in the "on" level. Some
drivers may change this setting when they are bound.
- This file is deprecated and will be removed after 2010.
+ This file is deprecated.
Use the power/control file instead; it does exactly the
same thing.
--
2.43.0
On Sat, May 30, 2026 at 11:34:07PM +0000, Sardaruddin Syed wrote: > The sysfs power/level interface is still implemented and documented > despite the removal notice stating it would be removed after 2010. > > Remove the outdated removal timeline while keeping the deprecation > notice and recommendation to use power/control instead. > > Signed-off-by: Sardaruddin Syed <ssardaruddin2002@gmail.com> > --- > Documentation/ABI/obsolete/sysfs-bus-usb | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/obsolete/sysfs-bus-usb b/Documentation/ABI/obsolete/sysfs-bus-usb > index bd096d33fbc7..067016e62e11 100644 > --- a/Documentation/ABI/obsolete/sysfs-bus-usb > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/obsolete/sysfs-bus-usb > @@ -26,6 +26,6 @@ Description: > initializes all non-hub devices in the "on" level. Some > drivers may change this setting when they are bound. > > - This file is deprecated and will be removed after 2010. > + This file is deprecated. > Use the power/control file instead; it does exactly the > same thing. Why not just remove it instead? thanks, greg k-h
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.