zram_read_page() picks the sync or async backing device read path
based on whether the parent bio is NULL.  zram_bvec_write_partial()
passes its parent bio down, so for ZRAM_WB slots the read is
dispatched asynchronously and zram_read_page() returns 0 while the
bio is still in flight.  The caller then runs memcpy_from_bvec(),
zram_write_page() and __free_page() on the buffer, leaving the
async read to write into a freed page.

zram_bvec_read_partial() was switched to NULL in commit 4e3c87b9421d
("zram: fix synchronous reads") for the same reason; the
write_partial counterpart was missed.

Fixes: 4e3c87b9421d ("zram: fix synchronous reads")
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Cunlong Li <shenxiaogll@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index aebc710f0d6a..b23a8bbb687c 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -2333,7 +2333,7 @@ static int zram_bvec_write_partial(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec,
 	if (!page)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	ret = zram_read_page(zram, page, index, bio);
+	ret = zram_read_page(zram, page, index, NULL);
 	if (!ret) {
 		memcpy_from_bvec(page_address(page) + offset, bvec);
 		ret = zram_write_page(zram, page, index);

---
base-commit: e8c2f9fdadee7cbc75134dc463c1e0d856d6e5c7
change-id: 20260526-zram-b01425b7e6c6

Best regards,
-- 
Cunlong Li <shenxiaogll@gmail.com>

On (26/05/27 11:26), Cunlong Li wrote:
> zram_read_page() picks the sync or async backing device read path
> based on whether the parent bio is NULL.  zram_bvec_write_partial()
> passes its parent bio down, so for ZRAM_WB slots the read is
> dispatched asynchronously and zram_read_page() returns 0 while the
> bio is still in flight.  The caller then runs memcpy_from_bvec(),
> zram_write_page() and __free_page() on the buffer, leaving the
> async read to write into a freed page.
> 
> zram_bvec_read_partial() was switched to NULL in commit 4e3c87b9421d
> ("zram: fix synchronous reads") for the same reason; the
> write_partial counterpart was missed.
> 
> Fixes: 4e3c87b9421d ("zram: fix synchronous reads")
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Cunlong Li <shenxiaogll@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> index aebc710f0d6a..b23a8bbb687c 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> @@ -2333,7 +2333,7 @@ static int zram_bvec_write_partial(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec,
>  	if (!page)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	ret = zram_read_page(zram, page, index, bio);
> +	ret = zram_read_page(zram, page, index, NULL);

Sounds like zram_bvec_write_partial() doesn't need bio parameter then?

On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 12:45:37PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (26/05/27 11:26), Cunlong Li wrote:
> > zram_read_page() picks the sync or async backing device read path
> > based on whether the parent bio is NULL.  zram_bvec_write_partial()
> > passes its parent bio down, so for ZRAM_WB slots the read is
> > dispatched asynchronously and zram_read_page() returns 0 while the
> > bio is still in flight.  The caller then runs memcpy_from_bvec(),
> > zram_write_page() and __free_page() on the buffer, leaving the
> > async read to write into a freed page.
> > 
> > zram_bvec_read_partial() was switched to NULL in commit 4e3c87b9421d
> > ("zram: fix synchronous reads") for the same reason; the
> > write_partial counterpart was missed.
> > 
> > Fixes: 4e3c87b9421d ("zram: fix synchronous reads")
> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Cunlong Li <shenxiaogll@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > index aebc710f0d6a..b23a8bbb687c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > @@ -2333,7 +2333,7 @@ static int zram_bvec_write_partial(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec,
> >  	if (!page)
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> >  
> > -	ret = zram_read_page(zram, page, index, bio);
> > +	ret = zram_read_page(zram, page, index, NULL);
> 
> Sounds like zram_bvec_write_partial() doesn't need bio parameter then?

Right -- v2 follows up with a cleanup patch that drops the bio
parameter from both zram_bvec_write_partial() and zram_bvec_write().

Will send v2 shortly.

Thanks,
Cunlong