MAINTAINERS | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Sending mail to Mark's kernel.org address results in the intel mail
server rejecting the mail. So drop him from all maintainer entries.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@kernel.org>
---
Hello,
please consider this a request to find out what happend to Mark for now,
and give him a chance to speak up. Maybe it's only a mail configuration
fsck.
Best regards
Uwe
MAINTAINERS | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 4087b67bbc69..0e45e113bfd8 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -9336,9 +9336,8 @@ S: Supported
F: drivers/edac/dmc520_edac.c
EDAC-E752X
-M: Mark Gross <markgross@kernel.org>
L: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
-S: Maintained
+S: Orphan
F: drivers/edac/e752x_edac.c
EDAC-E7XXX
@@ -13206,7 +13205,6 @@ F: drivers/crypto/intel/keembay/ocs-aes.h
INTEL KEEM BAY OCS ECC CRYPTO DRIVER
M: Prabhjot Khurana <prabhjot.khurana@intel.com>
-M: Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
S: Maintained
F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/intel,keembay-ocs-ecc.yaml
F: drivers/crypto/intel/keembay/Kconfig
@@ -26564,8 +26562,7 @@ S: Maintained
F: drivers/net/ethernet/tehuti/tn40*
TELECOM CLOCK DRIVER FOR MCPL0010
-M: Mark Gross <markgross@kernel.org>
-S: Supported
+S: Orphan
F: drivers/char/tlclk.c
TEMPO SEMICONDUCTOR DRIVERS
base-commit: e7e28506af98ce4e1059e5ec59334b335c00a246
--
2.47.3
On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 07:38:06PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Sending mail to Mark's kernel.org address results in the intel mail > server rejecting the mail. So drop him from all maintainer entries. Looking at the mailforward configuration on our side, I see that there are actually two destinations for markgross@kernel.org. I've removed the one that goes to his obsolete Intel address. I suggest we actually keep Mark in the MAINTAINERS file for the time being, but change his INTEL KEEM BAY OCS ECC CRYPTO DRIVER entry to use his kernel.org address as well. -K
Mark's intel address doesn't exist any more, update the maintainer entry
that is still using it to his kernel.org address that is already used in
other entries.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@kernel.org>
---
MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 4087b67bbc69..021a45e7cc1a 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -13206,7 +13206,7 @@ F: drivers/crypto/intel/keembay/ocs-aes.h
INTEL KEEM BAY OCS ECC CRYPTO DRIVER
M: Prabhjot Khurana <prabhjot.khurana@intel.com>
-M: Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
+M: Mark Gross <markgross@kernel.org>
S: Maintained
F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/intel,keembay-ocs-ecc.yaml
F: drivers/crypto/intel/keembay/Kconfig
base-commit: e7e28506af98ce4e1059e5ec59334b335c00a246
--
2.47.3
On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 09:32:38PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Mark's intel address doesn't exist any more, update the maintainer entry > that is still using it to his kernel.org address that is already used in > other entries. > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@kernel.org> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 4087b67bbc69..021a45e7cc1a 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -13206,7 +13206,7 @@ F: drivers/crypto/intel/keembay/ocs-aes.h > > INTEL KEEM BAY OCS ECC CRYPTO DRIVER > M: Prabhjot Khurana <prabhjot.khurana@intel.com> > -M: Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com> > +M: Mark Gross <markgross@kernel.org> > S: Maintained > F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/intel,keembay-ocs-ecc.yaml > F: drivers/crypto/intel/keembay/Kconfig Acked-by: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org> Thanks! -K
On 5/26/26 10:38, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > EDAC-E752X > -M: Mark Gross <markgross@kernel.org> > L: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org > -S: Maintained > +S: Orphan > F: drivers/edac/e752x_edac.c ... Mark left Intel a few months ago. It's not an email infrastructure problem. I've been periodically sending mail to all of the Intel folks in MAINTAINERS and sending patches just like this when emails are bouncing. I figure that if folks pop back up with a working email, these kinds of changes are easy enough to revert. I appreciate you taking care of this before I got to it! Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.