Pointers should use NULL instead of explicit '0', as pointed out by sparse:

fs/fuse/dev.c:2151:48: Using plain integer as NULL pointer

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202605071323.XbMBRsje-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Dongyang Jin <jindongyang@kylinos.cn>
---
 fs/fuse/dev.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
index be4e66ed633c..6e5439515ead 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -2148,7 +2148,7 @@ void fuse_chan_abort(struct fuse_chan *fch, bool abort_with_err)
 		fch->connected = 0;
 		spin_unlock(&fch->bg_lock);
 
-		fuse_chan_set_initialized(fch, 0);
+		fuse_chan_set_initialized(fch, NULL);
 		list_for_each_entry(fud, &fch->devices, entry) {
 			struct fuse_pqueue *fpq = &fud->pq;
 
-- 
2.25.1