From: Robby Cai <robby.cai@nxp.com>

The example in imx8mq-mipi-csi2.yaml uses imx8mm_mipi_csi_{in,out}
endpoint labels, which is confusing for an i.MX8MQ binding. The labels
could be removed as they are not functionally required in the example,
but they have a documentation purpose that brings value to the reader.
Rename them mipi_csi_{in,out} to avoid the confusion.

Signed-off-by: Robby Cai <robby.cai@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
---
Changes since v1:

- Drop imx8mpq_ prefix from label name
- Update commit message
- Drop Fixes: tag
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/media/nxp,imx8mq-mipi-csi2.yaml       | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/nxp,imx8mq-mipi-csi2.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/nxp,imx8mq-mipi-csi2.yaml
index 4fcfc4fd3565..9eee67ed2685 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/nxp,imx8mq-mipi-csi2.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/nxp,imx8mq-mipi-csi2.yaml
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ examples:
             port@0 {
                 reg = <0>;
 
-                imx8mm_mipi_csi_in: endpoint {
+                mipi_csi_in: endpoint {
                     remote-endpoint = <&imx477_out>;
                     data-lanes = <1 2 3 4>;
                 };
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ examples:
             port@1 {
                 reg = <1>;
 
-                imx8mm_mipi_csi_out: endpoint {
+                mipi_csi_out: endpoint {
                     remote-endpoint = <&csi_in>;
                 };
             };

base-commit: d97d13c24d7893abcfb80d38630ce74daaa1434c
-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart