net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 28 +++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
[ Upstream commit def602e498a4f951da95c95b1b8ce8ae68aa733a ]
In case that the set is full, a new element gets published then removed
without waiting for the RCU grace period, while RCU reader can be
walking over it already.
To address this issue, add the element transaction even if set is full,
but toggle the set_full flag to report -ENFILE so the abort path safely
unwinds the set to its previous state.
As for element updates, decrement set->nelems to restore it.
A simpler fix is to call synchronize_rcu() in the error path.
However, with a large batch adding elements to already maxed-out set,
this could cause noticeable slowdown of such batches.
Fixes: 35d0ac9070ef ("netfilter: nf_tables: fix set->nelems counting with no NLM_F_EXCL")
Reported-by: Inseo An <y0un9sa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
[ Minor conflict resolved. ]
Signed-off-by: Li hongliang <1468888505@139.com>
---
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index a0914a92e07d..6fc88bf51109 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -6803,6 +6803,7 @@ static int nft_add_set_elem(struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set,
struct nft_data_desc desc;
enum nft_registers dreg;
struct nft_trans *trans;
+ bool set_full = false;
u64 timeout;
u64 expiration;
int err, i;
@@ -7095,10 +7096,18 @@ static int nft_add_set_elem(struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set,
if (err < 0)
goto err_elem_free;
+ if (!(flags & NFT_SET_ELEM_CATCHALL)) {
+ unsigned int max = nft_set_maxsize(set), nelems;
+
+ nelems = atomic_inc_return(&set->nelems);
+ if (nelems > max)
+ set_full = true;
+ }
+
trans = nft_trans_elem_alloc(ctx, NFT_MSG_NEWSETELEM, set);
if (trans == NULL) {
err = -ENOMEM;
- goto err_elem_free;
+ goto err_set_size;
}
ext->genmask = nft_genmask_cur(ctx->net);
@@ -7130,23 +7139,16 @@ static int nft_add_set_elem(struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set,
goto err_element_clash;
}
- if (!(flags & NFT_SET_ELEM_CATCHALL)) {
- unsigned int max = nft_set_maxsize(set);
-
- if (!atomic_add_unless(&set->nelems, 1, max)) {
- err = -ENFILE;
- goto err_set_full;
- }
- }
-
nft_trans_elem(trans) = elem;
nft_trans_commit_list_add_tail(ctx->net, trans);
- return 0;
-err_set_full:
- nft_setelem_remove(ctx->net, set, &elem);
+ return set_full ? -ENFILE : 0;
+
err_element_clash:
kfree(trans);
+err_set_size:
+ if (!(flags & NFT_SET_ELEM_CATCHALL))
+ atomic_dec(&set->nelems);
err_elem_free:
nf_tables_set_elem_destroy(ctx, set, elem.priv);
err_parse_data:
--
2.34.1On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 03:55:18PM +0800, Li hongliang wrote: > From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> > > [ Upstream commit def602e498a4f951da95c95b1b8ce8ae68aa733a ] > > In case that the set is full, a new element gets published then removed > without waiting for the RCU grace period, while RCU reader can be > walking over it already. [...] > [ Minor conflict resolved. ] > Signed-off-by: Li hongliang <1468888505@139.com> Queued for 6.6, thanks. Note: 6.1, 5.15 and 5.10 also contain the buggy Fixes: parent (35d0ac9070ef) and would benefit from the same fix. A hand-crafted backport for those branches would be welcome if you have the cycles. -- Thanks, Sasha
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.