drivers/regulator/core.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
device_is_bound() must be called with the device lock taken. Add missing
synchronization in regulator_resolve_supply().
Fixes: 66d228a2bf03 ("regulator: core: Don't use regulators as supplies until the parent is bound")
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index dc5d67767336..1274a1ff8e17 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -2240,10 +2240,12 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
* device get probe deferred and unregisters the supply.
*/
if (r->dev.parent && r->dev.parent != rdev->dev.parent) {
- if (!device_is_bound(r->dev.parent)) {
- put_device(&r->dev);
- ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
- goto out;
+ scoped_guard(device, r->dev.parent) {
+ if (!device_is_bound(r->dev.parent)) {
+ put_device(&r->dev);
+ ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
+ goto out;
+ }
}
}
--
2.47.3
On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 12:20:15PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> @@ -2240,10 +2240,12 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> * device get probe deferred and unregisters the supply.
> */
> if (r->dev.parent && r->dev.parent != rdev->dev.parent) {
> - if (!device_is_bound(r->dev.parent)) {
> - put_device(&r->dev);
> - ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> - goto out;
> + scoped_guard(device, r->dev.parent) {
> + if (!device_is_bound(r->dev.parent)) {
> + put_device(&r->dev);
> + ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + goto out;
> + }
How does this work if a regulator is being registered in the context of
a MFD registering it's children from probe()?
I'm also not convinced that mixing a scoped guard into the middle of
goto based cleanup is the best thing.
On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 1:15 PM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 12:20:15PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>
> > @@ -2240,10 +2240,12 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> > * device get probe deferred and unregisters the supply.
> > */
> > if (r->dev.parent && r->dev.parent != rdev->dev.parent) {
> > - if (!device_is_bound(r->dev.parent)) {
> > - put_device(&r->dev);
> > - ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > - goto out;
> > + scoped_guard(device, r->dev.parent) {
> > + if (!device_is_bound(r->dev.parent)) {
> > + put_device(&r->dev);
> > + ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
>
> How does this work if a regulator is being registered in the context of
> a MFD registering it's children from probe()?
>
Yeah, I've seen the comment from sashiko. I don't have an idea that
doesn't involve a serious rework, so we may drop this patch. After all
it worked without issues so far.
Bart
> I'm also not convinced that mixing a scoped guard into the middle of
> goto based cleanup is the best thing.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.